2016
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldw010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core decompression versus other joint preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Further studies are needed to identify the best therapeutic approach to the ONFH.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term use of highdose glucocorticoids is the most common cause of NOFH, and it occurs mostly in young adults [30]. At present, the clinical treatment of NOFH includes conservative treatment (biophysical stimulation such as pulsed electromagnetic field) and surgical methods (such as core decompression), but the effect is not significant [31]. In addition, most patients undergo one or more artificial joint revision operations, which imposes serious economic and mental burdens on society and patients' families [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term use of highdose glucocorticoids is the most common cause of NOFH, and it occurs mostly in young adults [30]. At present, the clinical treatment of NOFH includes conservative treatment (biophysical stimulation such as pulsed electromagnetic field) and surgical methods (such as core decompression), but the effect is not significant [31]. In addition, most patients undergo one or more artificial joint revision operations, which imposes serious economic and mental burdens on society and patients' families [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were able to prove that especially classic core decompression does not improve clinical outcomes compared with other jointpreserving therapies. There even is some indication for less beneficial overall results [45]. On the whole, determining the role of core decompression remains difficult since lots of modifications have been described so far, and there is a lack of comparing studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, in adults with primary ON of weight bearing joints, the most common treatments include invasive forms of secondary and tertiary prevention, including core decompression [51] with or without stem cell infusion [52], vascularized fibular graft [53], and ultimately total joint replacement [54]. Hence, new diagnoses of ON, initially made by the radiologist and confirmed by the orthopedic or dental surgeon or clinician [55], rarely undergo a rigorous workup for thrombophilia or hypofibrinolysis [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%