1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02644712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core Hardenability Calculations for Carburizing Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial hardness (i.e., hardness at the first Jominy position) and the 50 pct martensite hardness were calculated from the alloy carbon concentration using expressions provided in ASTM A255-07 [11] and from data and expressions available in Hodge and Orehoski [20] and Tartaglia and Eldis. [14] SAE J406 [13] also provides expressions for these two hardness values, and calculated values using the SAE J406 expressions are approximately 0.3 HRC less than estimates following ASTM A 255-07. [11] The hardness drop between the initial hardness and 50 pct martensite hardness are essentially identical between the two standards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The initial hardness (i.e., hardness at the first Jominy position) and the 50 pct martensite hardness were calculated from the alloy carbon concentration using expressions provided in ASTM A255-07 [11] and from data and expressions available in Hodge and Orehoski [20] and Tartaglia and Eldis. [14] SAE J406 [13] also provides expressions for these two hardness values, and calculated values using the SAE J406 expressions are approximately 0.3 HRC less than estimates following ASTM A 255-07. [11] The hardness drop between the initial hardness and 50 pct martensite hardness are essentially identical between the two standards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Tartaglia and Eldis [14] provided regression equations to calculate the base ideal critical diameter, which is a function of carbon concentration, for specific ASTM grain size numbers. Within their framework, the base ideal critical diameter is 12 pct less for a PAGS of ASTM No.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations