2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core loading pattern optimization of a typical two-loop 300MWe PWR using Simulated Annealing (SA), novel crossover Genetic Algorithms (GA) and hybrid GA(SA) schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the substance cools slowly, annealing will achieve its goal. In contrast, if the substance cools quickly, the object will be brought into a local optimal state, which does not have minimal energy [26].…”
Section: Selecting the Most Effective Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the substance cools slowly, annealing will achieve its goal. In contrast, if the substance cools quickly, the object will be brought into a local optimal state, which does not have minimal energy [26].…”
Section: Selecting the Most Effective Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the literature (Dahal and Chakpitak, 2007;Zameer et al, 2014), some strategies are proposed to merge the population in GAs. In one strategy called predefined shares, each set has the same portion and n(pop) is a combination of P(t) + Q(t) + R(t) in which P(t), Q(t) and R(t) are the main population, crossover population and mutation population, respectively.…”
Section: Creation Of New Generation By Sa Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has urged the nuclear community to integrate ML in the industry within the framework of emerging technologies, given its superior capability in handling big-data (IAEA, 2020). In fact, the potential of using ML technology has been explored to estimate some key figures of merit such as the power pin peaking factor (Bae et al, 2008), the wall temperature at critical heat flux (Park et al, 2020), the flow pattern identification (Lin, 2020), to detect anomalies and warn of equipment failure (Ahsan and Hassan, 2013;Chen and Jahanshahi, 2018;Devereux et al, 2019); to determine core configuration and core loading pattern optimization (Siegelmann et al, 1997;Faria and Pereira, 2003;Erdogan and Gekinli, 2003;Zamer et al, 2014;Nissan, 2019), to identify initiating events and categorize accidents (Santosh et al, 2003;Na et al, 2004;Lee and Lee, 2006;Ma and Jiang, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2020;Farber and Cole, 2020) and to determine of key performance metrics and safety parameters (Ridlluan et al, 2009;Montes et al, 2009;Farshad Faghihi and Seyed, 2011;Patra et al, 2012;Young, 2019;Park et al, 2020;Alketbi and Diab, 2021), and in radiation protection for isotope identification and classification (Keller and Kouzes, 1994;Abdel-Aal and Al-Haddad, 1997;Chen, 2009;Kamuda and Sullivan, 2019), etc. However, it is worth noting that the application of ML in nuclear safety is still limited despite its potential to enhance performance, safety, as well as economics of plant operation (Chai et al, 2003) which warrants further research (Gomez Fernandez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%