2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.11991/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core outcome set measurement for future clinical trials in acute myeloid leukemia: the HARMONY study protocol using a multi-stakeholder consensus-based Delphi process and a final consensus meeting

Abstract: Background Acute myeloid leukemia is the most common acute leukemia in adults with an unacceptably low cure rate. In recent years a number of new treatment strategies and compounds were developed for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. There were several randomized, controlled clinical trials with the objective to improve patients’ management and patients’ outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Unfortunately, these trials are not always directly comparable, as they do not measure the same outcomes and curren… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Inter-laboratory tests are being performed within the ELN for MFC, qPCR-based NPM1 analysis and NGS-MRD, and multicenter initiatives are encouraged. 50 Turnaround time, cost, sensitivity and effects of clonal evolution should be compared between these approaches. The recommended MRD cutoffs of the major MRD technologies should be validated in the ELN risk groups, and the value of alternative cut-points should be evaluated.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Inter-laboratory tests are being performed within the ELN for MFC, qPCR-based NPM1 analysis and NGS-MRD, and multicenter initiatives are encouraged. 50 Turnaround time, cost, sensitivity and effects of clonal evolution should be compared between these approaches. The recommended MRD cutoffs of the major MRD technologies should be validated in the ELN risk groups, and the value of alternative cut-points should be evaluated.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes to be included in the HAVF were determined using the HARMONY lists of outcomes 19 that were generated by multistakeholder groups specifically set up for the development of core outcome sets (COS) for the different HMs. COS were developed by a multistakeholder consensus-based Delphi methodology, 20 following COMET 21 recommendations from the international COS-STAD study. 22 Stakeholders included health service users, health service practitioners, researchers, regulators, drug developer, patients, and patient advocates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%