1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01414782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core-particle coupling and polarization effects

Abstract: The unpaired particle in an odd-mass transitional nucleus exerts forces on the rest of the system leading to an effective shape which is in general dependent on the j-orbital occupied by the extra particle. To account for this polarization effect we propose to modify the collective matrix elements by a phenomenological polarization factor. This enables us to describe also such band structures by the core-particle coupling model for which the common coupling rules seem to fail. Selecting a typical case the mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a practical point of view, it suffices to diagonalize the Hamiltonian H e using the complete set of states (physical and spurious) generated by H o and selecting the largest half of the eigenvalues as the physical solutions. The diagonalizationof H e within the subspace of physical (positive energy) states of H o performed originally when solving the model [3] can lead to a bad approximation of physical solutions of H or even give some unphysical solutions, since matrix elements of H e between physical and unphysical solutions need not be small. It is of interest to contrast this procedure with the one used earlier in which the term H e was turned on adiabatically and the physical solutions followed by using a wave function overlap argument.…”
Section: Physical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a practical point of view, it suffices to diagonalize the Hamiltonian H e using the complete set of states (physical and spurious) generated by H o and selecting the largest half of the eigenvalues as the physical solutions. The diagonalizationof H e within the subspace of physical (positive energy) states of H o performed originally when solving the model [3] can lead to a bad approximation of physical solutions of H or even give some unphysical solutions, since matrix elements of H e between physical and unphysical solutions need not be small. It is of interest to contrast this procedure with the one used earlier in which the term H e was turned on adiabatically and the physical solutions followed by using a wave function overlap argument.…”
Section: Physical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation spectra and electromagnetic properties of odd nuclei in the Z--50 region are well described within CPC calculations [13,20,21]. In these calculations the experimental findings of the underlying even cores with mass numbers A-1 and A+ 1 are included.…”
Section: Core-particle Coupling Calculations ( Cpc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model the odd nucleon is considered as a quasiparticle which represents either a particle coupled to the A--1 core or a hole coupled to the A + 1 core or a superposition of both. A general formalism of the core-quasiparticle coupling model with two different cores has been presented by D6nau and Frauendorf [3]. In the present paper we include into this model the spin dependence of the pairing parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (6) and (7 a, b) we have included the averaged pairing parameter Aj (defined by (10)) depending on the total angular momentum J instead of constant A. In the second step, the diagonalization of the collective Hamiltonian is performed in the basis of the deformed one-quasiparticle states [3]. In the approximation of the one-quasiparticle state basis the matrix elements of the collective Hamiltonian, H c~…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation