2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core, shapley value, nucleolus and nash bargaining solution: A Survey of recent developments and applications in operations management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the core is not empty, the nucleolus should lie in the core as well, guaranteeing the grand coalition's stability [17]. However, obtaining the nucleolus might not be simple because of numerical issues [18]. Additionally, none of the monotonicity requirements are guaranteed [18].…”
Section: B Nucleolusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the core is not empty, the nucleolus should lie in the core as well, guaranteeing the grand coalition's stability [17]. However, obtaining the nucleolus might not be simple because of numerical issues [18]. Additionally, none of the monotonicity requirements are guaranteed [18].…”
Section: B Nucleolusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, obtaining the nucleolus might not be simple because of numerical issues [18]. Additionally, none of the monotonicity requirements are guaranteed [18]. Moreover, the payoff distribution based on the concept of the nucleolus can be unstable if the core doesn't exist.…”
Section: B Nucleolusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike competing with others [ 39 ], agents in cooperative games aim to solve a common task or maximizing the overall payoff to collaborate with each other. Therefore, from this perspective, the MCA problem can also be considered a profit-sharing problem in cooperative games [ 40 ], for which various methods such as the Shapley method [ 41 ], the core [ 42 , 43 ], Nash bargaining [ 43 ], and bankruptcy [ 44 , 45 ] have been suggested for. One of the methods used to allocate resources when they are limited and there are many applicants is the bankruptcy method [ 45 ]; this happens when the available resources are less than what is requested by the applicants.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te retailer's bargaining power is α, and the manufacturer's bargaining power is 1 − α. We consider the Nash bargaining solution, which is often used when two players decide how to share the surplus [37,38]. Many studies [39][40][41] apply the Nash bargaining solution to analyze the game and decisionmaking between upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain.…”
Section: Model Description and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%