Corneal Artificial Endothelial Layer (EndoArt): Literature Review and Our Experience

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the morphological corneal changes and outcomes following the implantation of an artificial endothelial layer (EndoArt) in patients with chronic corneal oedema. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted alongside a detailed analysis of two clinical cases with chronic corneal oedema that were treated using EndoArt. Our experience with these two cases is included to provide practical insights and real-world outcomes. Results: Across the 24 cases reported (including the two presented here), an analysis was possible in 23 cases. Notably, 82% of patients had undergone at least one previous corneal transplant, with 39% having undergone three or more transplants. Additionally, 78% of cases had ocular comorbidities, with glaucoma surgery being the most prevalent (83%), which could have impacted visual outcomes. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 17 months with a median of 3 months. After EndoArt implantation, the average reduction in the central corneal thickness (CCT) was 29%, and the rebubbling rate was 47.8%, with some cases requiring no rebubbling, while others required it up to 100% of the time. Visual acuity significantly improved from a mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) value of 1.61 ± 0.5 logMAR to 1.07 ± 0.59 logMAR (p < 0.001). The CCT decreased from 771 ± 146 µm to 580 ± 134 µm (p < 0.001). These findings are consistent with our experience. Conclusions: EndoArt shows promise as an alternative treatment for chronic corneal oedema in complex cases where conventional corneal transplantation has failed or carries a high risk of failure. The morphological changes observed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) were similar to those reported after endothelial keratoplasty, with the notable exception of the absence of the hyper-reflective donor–host interface.