2021
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Densitometry After Uneventful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty—5-Year Outcomes

Abstract: Purpose:The purpose of this study is to analyze the course of corneal densitometry (CD), endothelial cell density (ECD), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) 5 years after uneventful Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).Methods:Sixty uneventful cases (51 patients) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. CD of various corneal layers (anterior, central, posterior, and total layer) and zones (0–2 mm, 2–6 mm, and 6–10 mm) were measured with Scheimpflug to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean total anterior, central, and posterior CD differed significantly among the time points, with a significant increase from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits and no significant difference from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit. Concerning central (0–2-mm annulus), paracentral (2–6-mm annulus), mid-peripheral (6–10-mm annulus) [ 25 ] , and peripheral (10–12-mm annulus) [ 26 ] zones, CD for the anterior layer in the central, paracentral, and mid-peripheral zones and for the central layer in all four zones differed significantly among time points, with a significant increase from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits, and no change from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit, except for the central 2–6-mm zone, in which CD decreased significantly from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit, and the central 10–12-mm zone, in which CD did not differ significantly in each pairwise comparison. In contrast, CD for the posterior layer in the paracentral zone decreased significantly from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits but increased significantly, to a lesser extent, from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean total anterior, central, and posterior CD differed significantly among the time points, with a significant increase from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits and no significant difference from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit. Concerning central (0–2-mm annulus), paracentral (2–6-mm annulus), mid-peripheral (6–10-mm annulus) [ 25 ] , and peripheral (10–12-mm annulus) [ 26 ] zones, CD for the anterior layer in the central, paracentral, and mid-peripheral zones and for the central layer in all four zones differed significantly among time points, with a significant increase from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits, and no change from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit, except for the central 2–6-mm zone, in which CD decreased significantly from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit, and the central 10–12-mm zone, in which CD did not differ significantly in each pairwise comparison. In contrast, CD for the posterior layer in the paracentral zone decreased significantly from the preoperative to the 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits but increased significantly, to a lesser extent, from the 1-month to the 3-month postoperative visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%