2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Dystrophy Mutations Drive Pathogenesis by Targeting TGFBIp Stability and Solubility in a Latent Amyloid-forming Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate TGFBIp or some of its degradation products as HtrA1 substrates, the in vitro proteolysis of wild-type and mutant TGFBIp and FAS1-4 proteins was analyzed (Poulsen et al, 2019). HtrA1 showed the highest preferences for mutant TGFBIp associated with the LCD phenotype, especially when using the FAS1-4 domain as a substrate (consistent with the increased protease sensitivity of these mutants (Stenvang et al, 2018)). Furthermore, degraded FAS1-4 formed amyloid fibrils consisting mainly of peptides overlapping with the Y571-R588 region highly represented in in vivo LCD deposits.…”
Section: Htra1 Proteolysis In Lcdmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To validate TGFBIp or some of its degradation products as HtrA1 substrates, the in vitro proteolysis of wild-type and mutant TGFBIp and FAS1-4 proteins was analyzed (Poulsen et al, 2019). HtrA1 showed the highest preferences for mutant TGFBIp associated with the LCD phenotype, especially when using the FAS1-4 domain as a substrate (consistent with the increased protease sensitivity of these mutants (Stenvang et al, 2018)). Furthermore, degraded FAS1-4 formed amyloid fibrils consisting mainly of peptides overlapping with the Y571-R588 region highly represented in in vivo LCD deposits.…”
Section: Htra1 Proteolysis In Lcdmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Of these, both LCD mutants and the variant GCD2 mutant were destabilizing; these mutants also exposed more hydrophobic surface area (i.e., were "sticky") and readily succumbed to trypsin degradation. Remarkably, despite a similar lack of stability, the LCD mutants formed amyloid significantly better than their GCD2 counterpart, and the aggregates formed by the variant GCD2 mutant (like the GCD1 mutant R555W) were non-amyloid (Stenvang et al, 2018).…”
Section: A Comprehensive Mutagenic and Bioinformatics Study Highlights Fundamental Differences Between Lcd And Gcd Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aggregation and deposition of TGFBIp display different clinical phenotypes; the deposits range from amyloidogenic structures to amorphous granular deposits, or a combination of both 17 . Mutations in TGFBIp are not only known to alter the turnover rate but also alter the thermodynamic stability of the protein with several of the mutations leading to destabilized protein which is more likely to unfold [18][19][20] . The mutant protein also possesses different proteolytic processing and clearance mechanism in the eye compared to the wild type protein (WT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%