1989
DOI: 10.1122/1.550039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corner Flow of Power Law Fluids

Abstract: SynopsisA local analysis of the flow of power law fluids near corners is performed. The equation for the stream function is shown to allow separated solutions in plane polar coordinates. The radial behavior is shown to be algebraic and results are given for the exponent for different values of corner angle and power law exponent. In addition, the critical angle for the onset of an eddy structure is found as function of the power law exponent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this solution the stress behaves like r -".4555 near to the corner. For power law fluids with a viscosity p = y" -* and for a 270" corner, Henricksen and Hassager [3] found CI = 0.37 for the thinning n = 0.5 (stress r -".31), and a = 0.640 for the thickening n = 1.5 (stress i" -".540). For a suspension of rigid rods aligned with the flow, Keiller and Hinch [4] found a = 0.58 (stress r -".42) at an effective concentration of the rods (p = 5, and a = 0.62 (stress Y -".38) for 4 = 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this solution the stress behaves like r -".4555 near to the corner. For power law fluids with a viscosity p = y" -* and for a 270" corner, Henricksen and Hassager [3] found CI = 0.37 for the thinning n = 0.5 (stress r -".31), and a = 0.640 for the thickening n = 1.5 (stress i" -".540). For a suspension of rigid rods aligned with the flow, Keiller and Hinch [4] found a = 0.58 (stress r -".42) at an effective concentration of the rods (p = 5, and a = 0.62 (stress Y -".38) for 4 = 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Griffiths [8] cites work in which it is shown how, for a different singular problem in which there is an interior angle of 2π rather than two interior angles of 3π/2, the numerical error in the solution behaves, and why it is not simply given by the analytic estimate. Finally, it is noted that Henriksen and Hassager [13], have carried out an analysis of the nature of the flow of a power law fluid past a re-entrant corner, of the sort that occurs in a planar contraction. However, we know of no similar analysis for the current problem.…”
Section: Appendix a The Form Of The Singularity At The Rotor Tip Cormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, Moffatt determined the critical angle of the corner required to form an eddy. Fenner [] and Henriksen and Hassager [] extended Moffatt's calculation to non‐Newtonian fluids and determined that the critical angle as a function of the rheological parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In glaciology, n can vary from n = 1 to 4 but is typically chosen to be 3 [ Durham et al , ; Goldsby and Kohlstedt , ; Cuffey and Paterson , ]. In a power law fluid, the critical angle α c for the formation of Moffatt eddies depends on the rheological exponent n [ Fenner , ; Henriksen and Hassager , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation