2010
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary angiography is a better predictor of mortality than noninvasive testing in patients evaluated for renal transplantation

Abstract: Objectives-The goal of this study was to compare whether coronary angiography or noninvasive imaging more accurately identifies coronary arter disease (CAD) and predicts mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under evaluation for transplantation.Background-CAD is a leading cause of mortality in patients with ESRD. The optimal method for identifying CAD in ESRD patients evaluated for transplantation remains controversial with a paucity of prognostic data currently available comparing noninvas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, coronary angiogram predicted MACE as well as survival not only in univariate model but also in multivariate model. This observation thus extends the observations of other studies done by De Lima et al 6 and Enkiri et al 12 who have argued for the superiority of the coronary angiogram in predicting survival or events over stress imaging. However, the low rate of angiographic positivity in our study makes us suggest that careful risk stratification using clinical judgment is the primary tool of prediction for MACE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the contrary, coronary angiogram predicted MACE as well as survival not only in univariate model but also in multivariate model. This observation thus extends the observations of other studies done by De Lima et al 6 and Enkiri et al 12 who have argued for the superiority of the coronary angiogram in predicting survival or events over stress imaging. However, the low rate of angiographic positivity in our study makes us suggest that careful risk stratification using clinical judgment is the primary tool of prediction for MACE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Experimental evidence regarding the impact of angiographically significant CAD on clinical event rates and long-term survival in patients with ESRD is lacking and observational studies have reported variable results (Table 1). Angiographic CAD has been documented to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [39, 40, 50, 52] and has been associated with increased mortality [31, 48, 49]. Sharma et al [31] reported a significantly worse unadjusted 2-year survival among patients with angiographic CAD compared with patients with normal coronary arteries.…”
Section: Assessment Of Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data regarding survival prediction, however, are more variable. Several studies identified an abnormal finding on MPS to be an independent predictor of mortality in RTC and ESRD populations [51, 112, 115, 119], whereas others found no association between MPS results and survival [39, 49, 110, 113, 116, 120]. A meta-analysis by Wang et al found that MPS was as good as ICA at predicting MACE and cardiovascular mortality, but worse than ICA for all-cause mortality [53].…”
Section: Assessment Of Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischaemia frequently occur in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD), and are directly associated with increased risk of mortality . CAD in ESRD is characterized by media thickening (Mönckeberg media sclerosis) and heavily calcified plaques .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%