2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary artery bypass graft imaging using ECG-gated multislice computed tomography: Comparison with catheter angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of 16-and 64-slice MDCT in examining vein and arterial graft stenosis (more than 50% luminal narrowing) has been evaluated (70)(71)(72)(73) (Figure 4). As with graft patency, 64-slice MDCT was capable of assessing stenosis in 98% of all vein and arterial grafts.…”
Section: Assessment Of Bypass Graft Occlusion and Restenosis Using Mdctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of 16-and 64-slice MDCT in examining vein and arterial graft stenosis (more than 50% luminal narrowing) has been evaluated (70)(71)(72)(73) (Figure 4). As with graft patency, 64-slice MDCT was capable of assessing stenosis in 98% of all vein and arterial grafts.…”
Section: Assessment Of Bypass Graft Occlusion and Restenosis Using Mdctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, no case of graft occlusion showed any additional patent segments or a patent proximal segment that was longer than 15 mm. Graft patency could not be determined when selective graft angiography was not performed: this was caused by the limited accessibility of complex composite grafts or by grafts without metallic markers (10). In this case, MSCT accurately demonstrated patency or occlusion, and this is an advantage of MSCT over conventional graft angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The detection of graft-occlusion using the 16-slice CT-scanner is quite reliable (Table 7) while the detection of non-occlusive stenoses is more problematic (47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53) . The 64-slice scanners perform slightly better, but evaluation of a post-bypass patient should include not only the bypass grafts but also the run-off native coronary segments distal to the graft anastomosis and non-grafted native coronary segments ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Ct-ca For Assessment Of Bypass Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%