2020
DOI: 10.1111/joim.13176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary artery calcium scoring: an evidence‐based guide for primary care physicians

Abstract: Coronary artery calcium scoring: an evidence-based guide for primary care physicians (Review).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A CAC score of 0 is generally considered a very good prognosis. 40 Recent US guidelines state that the CAC score could be used in primary prevention to improve classification of individuals identified by PCE to be at intermediate 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; a CAC score of 0 would indicate a lowered risk and therefore not favor treatment with statins, which would otherwise be recommended in this group. 45 However, studies and guidelines have questioned the negative predictive value of 0 CAC because significant atherosclerosis in the absence of CAC is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CAC score of 0 is generally considered a very good prognosis. 40 Recent US guidelines state that the CAC score could be used in primary prevention to improve classification of individuals identified by PCE to be at intermediate 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; a CAC score of 0 would indicate a lowered risk and therefore not favor treatment with statins, which would otherwise be recommended in this group. 45 However, studies and guidelines have questioned the negative predictive value of 0 CAC because significant atherosclerosis in the absence of CAC is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, atheromatic calcifications are used by clinicians to establish the risk of cardiovascular events, mainly in coronary plaques. Specifically, a scoring system based on cardiac computed tomography analysis is commonly use in the clinical practice as a well-established marker of coronary plaque burden [ 3 , 5 , 28 , 29 ]. No specific scoring systems have been developed to evaluate the risk associated to the presence of calcium deposits in carotid plaques since the lack of solid and inconvertible data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plaques were divided, according to the modified American Heart Association atherosclerosis classification [ 23 , 28 ], into stable and unstable. Unstable plaques were constituted by (a) thrombotic plaques associated with rupture or erosion of the cap; (b) healed plaque with a thrombus in organization; (c) vulnerable plaque or thin-cap fibro-atheroma (TCFA) characterized by a fibrous cap less than 165 µm thick heavily infiltrated by macrophages, CD68 positive (>25 per high magnification field), without plaque rupture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical impact of calcification on cardiovascular endpoints can paradigmatically be demonstrated in coronary artery disease [141]. Although the morphology and functional impact of atherosclerotic plaques (occlusive vs. non-occlusive) must be taken into account, the mere calcium scoring of coronary arteries in high-resolution computed tomography has become an important risk factor that influences guidelines for patient management, as for example, the indication for statin treatment [141,142]. Vascular calcification is promoted by different mechanisms, including an abnormal osteogenic differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells, the death of vascular smooth muscle cells, increased Pi levels, e.g., due to increased TNAP and Phospho1 activity or in chronic kidney disease, and chronic inflammation [120,143].…”
Section: Vascular Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%