2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction at Coronary CT Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the advancement of IR algorithm from HIR to MBIR, the utility of low-radiation-dose CT with MBIR has been investigated in chest [11], abdomen [12], and cardiovascular fields [13]. In the cervical spine field, CT reconstructed with HIR has been well investigated [14][15][16], but CT reconstructed with MBIR is not sufficiently recognized in the spine field.…”
Section: Scanning and Reconstruction Time Using A Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of IR algorithm from HIR to MBIR, the utility of low-radiation-dose CT with MBIR has been investigated in chest [11], abdomen [12], and cardiovascular fields [13]. In the cervical spine field, CT reconstructed with HIR has been well investigated [14][15][16], but CT reconstructed with MBIR is not sufficiently recognized in the spine field.…”
Section: Scanning and Reconstruction Time Using A Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise level is one of the important determinants of image quality, but our study results suggested that improved spatial resolution might be more beneficial for the visual evaluation. Tatsugami et al [ 22 ] investigated the effect of FIRST-CS on in-stent visualization, and they quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrated that FIRST-CS improved the sharpness of stent visualization with higher spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 2 , we measured the width of the edge response of the calcifications, determined by the 10–90 % edge rise distance (ERD), and calculated the edge rise slope (ERS) as: ERS = (CT90 %-CT10 %)/ERD [ 26 ]. The ERD and ERS were examined on both sides and the ERS obtained in NR- and SHR mode was compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%