2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Bifurcation Lesion–Management

Abstract: Coronary bifurcation lesion management is challenging even in this modern era of drug-eluting stents (DES). A debate always exists as to what mode of treatment is better–one-stent or two-stent strategy. As in hospital and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are more in the follow-up, what improvements in management strategy are required in relation to bifurcation lesions? We have more questions than answers for this type of lesion. In this article, we try to analyze these issues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature in this field clearly shows procedural success rates for CBLs as 91% -100%, and this study reinforces this evidence by reporting a success rate of 92.18% [41] [42]. A review by Jyotsana et al providing evidence from 12 studies on MACE in patients operated with 2SS versus one-stent strategy reported that the incidence of MACE varied from 3.4% to 23% [47]. The present study reported MACE in only 7.8% of the cases which is similar to the MACE occurrences reported in literature The use of IVUS offers tomographic images depicting the structure of the coronary arteries and serves as a valuable tool for assessing lesion geometry, the condition of the reference vessel, and optimizing stent placement [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The literature in this field clearly shows procedural success rates for CBLs as 91% -100%, and this study reinforces this evidence by reporting a success rate of 92.18% [41] [42]. A review by Jyotsana et al providing evidence from 12 studies on MACE in patients operated with 2SS versus one-stent strategy reported that the incidence of MACE varied from 3.4% to 23% [47]. The present study reported MACE in only 7.8% of the cases which is similar to the MACE occurrences reported in literature The use of IVUS offers tomographic images depicting the structure of the coronary arteries and serves as a valuable tool for assessing lesion geometry, the condition of the reference vessel, and optimizing stent placement [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%