“…Y. H. Chung [166] including 2019 participants (M:1518 (75.2%), F:501 (24.8%)) in cross-sectional analysis on relation between CACs and Lp(a), which was noted with its composition of apoB-100 and apolipoprotein(a) bounded in disulfide bond, it‘s small-particle size allowing freely crossing endothelium, similarity of apo(a) with plasminogen interfering it‘s antithrombotic actions and a moiety in Lp(a) closely resembling LDL; revealed among males aged ≥ 45 years (1313 participants, 86.4% of Males) those with CACs > 0 vs CACs = 0 had higher Lp(a) level by chi-square test (16.74 vs 13.97) and Lp(a) level significantly associated with having CACs > 0 by both univariable (OR:1.008, 95% CI:1.003–1.014) and multivariable models (OR:1.010, 95% CI:1.004–1.016), however, among males aged < 45 years and females aged either < 55 years or ≥ 55 years Lp(a) levels couldn‘t reach significant trend with having CACs > 0 by univariable and multivariable analyses, nevertheless, those with Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL vs Lp(a) 15–30 had significantly higher CACs by Kruskal-Wallis test.…”