2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1586-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary cardiac allograft vasculopathy versus native atherosclerosis: difficulties in classification

Abstract: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is regarded as a progressive and diffuse intimal hyperplastic lesion of arteries and veins that leads to insidious vessel narrowing and to allograft ischemic disease, such as acute myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. The coronary lesions in transplanted hearts are considered as a particular type of arteriosclerosis with many similarities but also significant differences compared to native coronary atherosclerosis. It is particularly difficult for pathologists to system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental data from mouse models have demonstrated that alloantibodies may induce the development of fibrous intimal thickening of coronary arteries, a hallmark of human cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). CAV is a multifaceted disease (8)(9)(10), with a complex pathophysiology involving either nonimmune and/or immune factors (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data from mouse models have demonstrated that alloantibodies may induce the development of fibrous intimal thickening of coronary arteries, a hallmark of human cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). CAV is a multifaceted disease (8)(9)(10), with a complex pathophysiology involving either nonimmune and/or immune factors (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in native atherosclerosis (18,19), these components of plaque instability can be encountered in CAV lesions, too, (7,20,21) and some of them (particularly increased lipid-rich, necrotic core and dense calcium) are associated with adverse clinical events in heart transplant recipients, such as recurrent acute cellular rejection, CAV progression, and need for revascularization (7,22). A histopathological study also demonstrated that in contrast to fibro-cellular plaques associated with different inflammatory cell subtypes in CAV versus native atherosclerosis (fewer macrophages and more lymphocytes in CAV), fibro-lipid plaques had the same inflammatory patterns between the 2 pathologies (23). That study also showed that intraplaque hemorrhage – another risk factor for plaque progression and instability in native atherosclerosis – was seen more frequently in CAV lesions than in native atherosclerosis and were colocalized with lipids and necrotic cores in these lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated an association of acute cellular rejection in the early post-transplant period with inflammatory plaque (increased necrotic core and dense calcium contents) and CAV progression late after heart transplantation (3, 7,12). Immunohistochemical studies also suggested that typical CAV lesions display a similar pattern of inflammatory changes when compared to the inflamed myocardium during acute cellular rejection (23,26). The current study used serial IVUS in the early post-transplant period and showed that early acute cellular rejection can also affect plaque destabilization (ASP progression) during the first year, supporting the major contribution of inflammatory pathways to the etiology of CAV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After heart transplantation, the transmural inflammation related to CAV often extends from the coronary artery intima to adventitia, and can even reach the perivascular tissues, (21,22) while inflammation is usually limited to the intima in atherosclerotic plaques. This widespread inflammation, which includes the tissue surrounding the blood vessels, may be associated with allograft rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%