2011
DOI: 10.4021/cr57w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Flow Reserve of the Non-Ischemia Related Coronary Artery During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Abstract: BackgroundIncorporation of analysis of coronary velocities in stress studies adds diagnostic value to both clinical variables and dobutamine echocardiography. Micorcirculatory abnormalities may precede obstructive corornary disease. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess Doppler derived coronary velocity and flow of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients without LAD-related ischemia.MethodsSixty nine patients with chest pain underwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Noninvasively determined LAD coronary artery flow was also important in the evaluation of coronary flow reserve. 19 The findings of the present study highlight further the importance of this kind of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…18 Noninvasively determined LAD coronary artery flow was also important in the evaluation of coronary flow reserve. 19 The findings of the present study highlight further the importance of this kind of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, apparently, absence of myocardial ischemia defines a normal coronary artery. However, in a previous study, it was shown that patients with remote ischemia had lower coronary flow reserve compared to subjects without ischemia ( 28 ). Therefore, absence of ischemia on stress echocardiography defines a normal coronary artery when confounding conditions associated with vasodilatation of the distal coronary bed and hyperemia are absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%