2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary lumen volume to myocardial mass ratio in primary microvascular angina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower cTFC after the injection of verapamil reflect relatively preserved epicardial coronary vasodilation and greater change in the coronary flow velocities and greater FCR, respectively. An impaired response to vasodilators of both conduit arteries and arterioles would result in smaller coronary arterial area for a given amount of myocardium to be perfused [ 20 ]. Although our patients on average presented with percentage of epicardial vasodilation in response to intracoronary verapamil similar to that of healthy controls [ 21 ], in more than one-third the coronary macrovascular dilation was impaired - epicardial lumen did not change after verapamil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower cTFC after the injection of verapamil reflect relatively preserved epicardial coronary vasodilation and greater change in the coronary flow velocities and greater FCR, respectively. An impaired response to vasodilators of both conduit arteries and arterioles would result in smaller coronary arterial area for a given amount of myocardium to be perfused [ 20 ]. Although our patients on average presented with percentage of epicardial vasodilation in response to intracoronary verapamil similar to that of healthy controls [ 21 ], in more than one-third the coronary macrovascular dilation was impaired - epicardial lumen did not change after verapamil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other reported papers [10][11][12][13] are related to volume-to-mass computations, which reported total coronary volume as a ratio to total LV myocardial mass.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated coronary volume to myocardial (V/M) mass computations using FFR CT , but calculation of relative mass per territory (expressed as percentage of total mass) has not been reported. [10][11][12][13] Experimentally, it has been shown that an excellent correlation exists between coronary blood flow and mass of the perfused territory. [14][15][16] Therefore, direct measurement of myocardial perfusion is a good approach to validate myocardial mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grover and colleagues expanded on the same concept and used coronary CTA derived mean total coronary luminal volume (V) and the mean myocardial mass (M) to compute the V/M ratio ( Figure 2 ). The mean ratio of coronary luminal volume to myocardial mass (V/M) was significantly lower in the CMD group (25.6 ± 5.9 mm 3 /g vs. 30.0 ± 6.5 mm 3 /g; p = 0.007) [ 47 ]. The major advantages of this method are the superior spatial resolution of CT and rapid scan time.…”
Section: Review Of Non-invasive Modalities For Cmd Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%