2011
DOI: 10.4103/1995-705x.86017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary perforation and covered stents: An update and review

Abstract: Coronary perforation is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. We present two different types of coronary intervention, but both ending with coronary perforation. However, these perforations were tackled successfully by covered stents. This article reviews the incidence, causes, presentation, and management of coronary perforation in the present era of aggressive interventional cardiology. Coronary perforations are classified as type I (extraluminal crater), II (myocardial or pericardial bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, covered stent grafts must be analyzed in terms of their sealing capacity in regard to vessel perforation, as well as in terms of their performance concerning endothelization rates, inflammatory reactions, thrombosis, and restenosis formation after implantation. Long-term patency rates are deemed poor, particularly for conventional PTFE-covered stents [ 6 , 7 ]. This further emphasizes the imperative need for new developments and appropriate testing models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, covered stent grafts must be analyzed in terms of their sealing capacity in regard to vessel perforation, as well as in terms of their performance concerning endothelization rates, inflammatory reactions, thrombosis, and restenosis formation after implantation. Long-term patency rates are deemed poor, particularly for conventional PTFE-covered stents [ 6 , 7 ]. This further emphasizes the imperative need for new developments and appropriate testing models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covered stents are usually made of bare metal stents with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or polyurethane coating. These stents display a 90% success rate for the treatment of perforation [ 2 , 6 ]. Their limitations, especially in case of bulky PTFE-covered stents, include significantly higher rates of thrombus formation and restenosis, compared to regular stents [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the greatest risk for PCI-related dissections is the presence of heavily calcified vessels or chronic total occlusions (CTO) [ 13 , 22 ], which require more aggressive catheter manipulation for better support, and the usage of stiff wires in vessels whose walls are less resistant to trauma [ 1 , 2 , 8 , 11 , 14 – 16 ]. Hydrophilic coated guide wires are associated with increased risk of coronary perforation [ 7 , 21 , 26 , 29 ], due to low coefficient of friction and ease of distal migration [ 29 ]. Amplatz catheters are more frequently associated with ostial coronary artery dissections [ 2 , 7 , 15 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased incidence of restenosis and target lesion intervention is also reported [ 7 , 33 , 34 ]. These have been attributed to increased thrombogenicity and delayed endothelialisation of these stents [ 23 , 26 ], thus warranting an extended duration of DAPT of at least 6 months to 1 year [ 24 , 26 , 34 , 35 ]. Prasugrel or ticagrelor are suitable antiplatelet agents of choice, due mainly to their lack of intrinsic resistance [ 23 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation