A recent paper in Front. Immunol. finds that among the adult patients admitted to Ohio State University hospital with acute respiratory failure and various comorbidities between 05/2020 and 11/2022, in those diagnosed with COVID-19, the mortality rate among the vaccinated was about twice that of those who were not. To account for this unexpected finding, Adhikari and colleagues evaluated antibody (Ab) responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccines and those to common cold coronaviruses. Some of the results reported seem incomplete or even contradictory. Here, an independent logical analysis of the data provided shows that many of the believed mechanisms of action of the mRNA vaccines are not substantiated and instead give rise to several hypotheses. In particular, the most potent mediators of protection are likely not those commonly described. The conclusions and hypotheses of this analysis are analogous to a recent publication in Science Translational Medicine which revealed that heterotypic immunity from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, but not COVID-19 vaccination, is associated with lower endemic coronavirus (CoV) incidence. Overall, any survival protection against a wide array of CoVs seems to be facilitated by natural and broad immune responses, even though this is commonly falsely attributed to the injections. The core mechanisms and effects of mRNA vaccines, as widely believed, are contradicted by the published clinical findings by Adhikari et al., and the commonly used measures to evaluate their effectiveness are unwarranted.