2021
DOI: 10.1111/bph.15359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronavirus disease 2019 and the revival of passive immunization: Antibody therapy for inhibiting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and preventing host cell infection: IUPHAR review 31

Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulated both the scientific community and healthcare companies to undertake an unprecedented effort with the aim of understanding the molecular mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and developing effective therapeutic solutions. The peculiar immune response triggered by this virus, which seems to last only few months, led to a search for alternatives such as passive immunization in addition to conventional vacci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(165 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A crucial unknown at this time is what immune responses are associated with protective immunity. While there is mixed evidence supporting the efficacy of convalescent-phase sera infusion for disease shortening, recent studies suggest that passive infusion of monoclonal antibodies can alter COVID-19 progression ( 8 , 9 ). In order to determine what constitutes protective immunity, well-standardized, reproducible antibody assays are required to establish correlates of risk and protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial unknown at this time is what immune responses are associated with protective immunity. While there is mixed evidence supporting the efficacy of convalescent-phase sera infusion for disease shortening, recent studies suggest that passive infusion of monoclonal antibodies can alter COVID-19 progression ( 8 , 9 ). In order to determine what constitutes protective immunity, well-standardized, reproducible antibody assays are required to establish correlates of risk and protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, nanobodies with neutralizing toxin activity have been studied for the treatment of bacterial toxins, such as those produced by Clostridium difficile , Bacillus anthracis , ricin and anthrax. These accomplishments show that nanobodies represent an alternative anti-infection therapeutic opportunity against bacterial and viral outbreaks ( 126 , 127 ) ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Nanobody Applications In Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to the host cell surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Several anti-spike/anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies have been isolated from both patients and by in vitro selection, some of them have entered clinical trials and cocktails of ligands binding to different epitopes have been proposed to overcome resistance due to the virus mutations ( 127 , 166 ). Multispecific antibody fragments are an alternative solution to prevent mutation-dependent resistance, as it has been already summarized in recent reviews ( 34 , 127 , 167 ).…”
Section: Nanobody Applications In Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cell is primarily driven by the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Spike glycoprotein S that forms a homotrimer able to interact with the host cell receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [ [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] ]. Because of its role, RBD is also the major target of neutralizing antibodies [ [6] , [7] , [8] ], both natural and recombinant [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%