The Handbook of Phonological Theory 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corpora and Exemplars in Phonology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schuppler and colleagues (2011) automatically transcribed part of the spontaneous speech incorporated in the IFA corpus (van Son, Binnenpoorte, van den Heuvel, & Pols, 2001) and found that 14% of the segments were transcribed differently in their transcriptions than in the transcriptions created with a different automatic method and corrected by human transcribers. Since disagreements between human transcribers may vary between 5.6% and 58%, depending on the degree of spontaneity of the speech (Kipp, Wesenick, & Schiel, 1996, 1997Ernestus & Baayen, 2011), these results strongly suggest that the transcriptions automatically generated with their transcriber and procedure are as reliable as human made transcriptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Schuppler and colleagues (2011) automatically transcribed part of the spontaneous speech incorporated in the IFA corpus (van Son, Binnenpoorte, van den Heuvel, & Pols, 2001) and found that 14% of the segments were transcribed differently in their transcriptions than in the transcriptions created with a different automatic method and corrected by human transcribers. Since disagreements between human transcribers may vary between 5.6% and 58%, depending on the degree of spontaneity of the speech (Kipp, Wesenick, & Schiel, 1996, 1997Ernestus & Baayen, 2011), these results strongly suggest that the transcriptions automatically generated with their transcriber and procedure are as reliable as human made transcriptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is unclear at what level of carefulness the original manual corrections of the Buckeye corpus were performed. In addition, whereas misalignment tends to be very consistent and systematic in forced aligners, human annotators can be biased by their own expectations and create different kinds of variations in the annotation (Ernestus and Baayen, 2011). Therefore, there is no way to know which annotation can be stronger relied on, especially for phones with gradual transitions such as sonorants.…”
Section: Final S In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the items in our experiment were carefully articulated at a slow rate, the differences with human transcribers are likely to be even smaller. Note, moreover, that differences of this size can also be observed between phonetically trained human transcribers (for an overview see, e. g., Ernestus & Baayen, 2011). In the resulting transcriptions, the words and pseudowords did not differ significantly in mean phoneme duration (words = 105.5 ms; pseudowords = 105.7 ms), t(5536.045) = −0.36, p .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%