2011
DOI: 10.1002/car.1128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporal punishment and physical abuse: population‐based trends for three‐to‐11‐year‐old children in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 30 years, public support for corporal punishment has declined sharply, both in terms of attitudes toward 13,14 and parents' actual use of physical discipline. 15 This cultural shift may have affected lower SES parents more than higher SES parents because their initial rates of corporal punishment were higher. If so, the SES gap in the use of corporal punishment would have declined over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past 30 years, public support for corporal punishment has declined sharply, both in terms of attitudes toward 13,14 and parents' actual use of physical discipline. 15 This cultural shift may have affected lower SES parents more than higher SES parents because their initial rates of corporal punishment were higher. If so, the SES gap in the use of corporal punishment would have declined over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine these trends in parents of kindergarten-age children because age 5, the typical age of kindergarten entry, is among the most common ages for parents to use spanking. 13,15 Beginning in 1986, the NLSY began collecting information biennially on the biological children of the female NLSY respondents. We use data from the 1988 or 1990 waves of data collection, which provides our earliest data point (data from 1988 were used if data were missing in 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque las cifras de prevalencia parecen haber descendido en muchos países en la última década (Zolotor et al, 2011), una mirada a las reacciones que provocó el cambio legislativo de 2007 en nuestro país, dirigido a prohibir el uso del castigo físico como medida de disciplina parental, así como los últimos estudios realizados al efecto (Calvete, Gámez-Guadix y Orue, 2010;Gámez-Guadix et al, 2010b) indican hasta qué punto existe una tolerancia social hacia este como forma de corrección a los hijos dentro de la familia y una discrepancia entre las creencias y las conductas parentales. Aunque también muestra como el cambio de tendencia no se dirige al desarrollo de estrategias de disciplina positiva sino a la sustitución del castigo físico por otras estrategias punitivas más vinculadas al maltrato emocional como insultar, amenazar, humillar, etc.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En general, se ha señalado que las estrategias de carácter más aversivo (por ejemplo, castigo físico, amenazas) están ampliamente relacionadas con numerosas consecuencias negativas y, entre ellas, con un mayor riesgo de presencia de maltrato y abuso físico sobre el niño (Gershoff, 2002) o de que el menor, a su vez, azote o golpee a otros niños (Simons y Wurtele, 2010). Algunos autores lo relacionan también con una disminución en la calidad de las relaciones padre-hijo (Zolotor et al, 2011) y con el desarrollo de problemas de ajuste psicológico (Landsford et al, 2014;Scott, Lewsey, Thompson y Wilson, 2013: Smith, Springer y Barret, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…28 Such a change is also observed on a national level in both Canada and the US. 29,30 A number of hypotheses might explain the results. First, the findings might reveal a change in parental norms regarding the use of these still socially acceptable discipline strategies, since we also noticed a significant and constant decline in maternal and paternal attitudes in favour of these practices in Quebec.…”
Section: Trends In Family Violence According To Children's Agementioning
confidence: 99%