“…The positive significant effect by share price shows firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers have strong tendency to follow catering theory as proposed by Wurgler (2004a, 2004b), Li and Lie (2006), and Pontoh (2015). The results also imply in general condition, firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers with age below 33 years are seems in mature phase for their business because they have abundant retained earnings (DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Fairchild, Guney, and Thanatawee, 2014), more profitable (Fama and French, 2001;Fama and French, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Longinidis and Symeonidis, 2013), and larger size (Grullon, Michaely, and Swaminathan, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006). But since debt has negative effect to dividends which is consistent with Acharya, Almeida, and Campello (2007) and Strebulaev and Yang (2013), then these firms cannot be said in mature phase at full because since the consequence of debt is interest expense then the profit for these firms are reduced make them have tendency to decrease their dividends.…”