2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
257
1
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
257
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Shane & Spicer, 1983;Stevens 1984;Freedman & Patten, 2004;and Lorraine, Collinson & Power, 2004). It is important to note though that these studies gauge the stock market reaction to mostly negative environmental information which as Aerts, Cormier & Magnan (2008) note could be responsible for the negative stock market impact documented in the literature. Shane & Spicer (1983) (Siegel, 2009), and by building good will and trust with its key stakeholders, help reduce the firm's transaction costs (e.g.…”
Section: Environmental and Social Disclosures And Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shane & Spicer, 1983;Stevens 1984;Freedman & Patten, 2004;and Lorraine, Collinson & Power, 2004). It is important to note though that these studies gauge the stock market reaction to mostly negative environmental information which as Aerts, Cormier & Magnan (2008) note could be responsible for the negative stock market impact documented in the literature. Shane & Spicer (1983) (Siegel, 2009), and by building good will and trust with its key stakeholders, help reduce the firm's transaction costs (e.g.…”
Section: Environmental and Social Disclosures And Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of such endogeneity, we used a three-stage least square (3SLS) model (Aerts et al, 2008;Anton et al, 2004) that considers environmental standards, training, and interpersonal contacts as endogenous variables. The model relies on a simultaneous estimation approach (Pindyck & Rubinfeld, 1991), in which (i) the factors that determine environmental standards are estimated simultaneously with (ii) the factors that explain employee training or interpersonal contacts, and (iii) the factors that define labor productivity.…”
Section: Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Scholars have suggested that environmental standards could allow firms to profit from reducing their negative environmental impact by improving their labor productivity (Ambec & Lanoie, 2008). Although an emerging body of literature investigates the environmental and financial benefits derived from the adoption of environmental standards (e.g., Aerts, Cormier, & Magnan, 2008;Barla, 2007;Christmann, 2000;Darnall, Gallagher, Andrews, & Amaral, 2000;Delmas, 2001;Delmas & Montiel, 2009;King & Lenox, 2002;Nakamura, Takahashi, & Vertinsky, 2001), exactly how these standards impact organizational effectiveness and employee productivity remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majorities of studies are conceptual (Jeucken 2001) and tend to be based on case studies (Thompson 1998;Coulson and Monks 1999;Goldstein 2001;Guo 2005). Other methods, for example, questionnaire surveys (Weber 2005;Weber et al 2006), web-based data collection, and econometric models (Aertsa et al 2008), have also been adopted. Despite these methods' popularity, the lack of quantitative reliability and validity calculation has limited their usefulness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%