Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type

Abstract

How does a business firm manage its relationship with the natural environment? What are the factors that influence the choice of such strategies? Does industry type matter? The authors introduce and operationalize the concept of corporate environmentalism in an effort to answer these questions. Using stakeholder theory, the authors identify four important antecedents to corporate environmentalism, namely, public concern, regulatory forces, competitive advantage, and top management commitment. The authors then use a political-economic framework to develop testable hypotheses. To test the hypotheses, the authors perform multigroup path analysis on data gathered from more than 240 firms. They find that corporate environmentalism is related to all hypothesized antecedents and that industry type moderates several of those relationships. In the high environmental impact sector, public concern has the greatest impact on corporate environmentalism, followed by regulatory forces. In the moderate environmental impact sector, competitive advantage has the greatest impact on corporate environmentalism, followed by regulatory forces. There are strong direct and mediating influences from top management commitment, which is the antecedent with the greatest impact on both industry groups. The influences of regulatory forces, public concern, and competitive advantage are all significantly mediated by top management commitment and moderated by industry type. The empirical findings and the ensuing discussion will be of interest to managers and public policy officials.

Environmental Proactivity and Firms’ Performance: Mediation Effect of Competitive Advantages in Spanish Wineries

“…• Differentiation-based competitive advantages (CAD): This variable included four items taken from Banerjee et al [27] and López-Gamero et al [79]. More specifically, in our study, we use loyalty of existing customers, attracting new customers, product image, and corporate image.…”

“…Many studies have already emphasized that environmental problems must be tackled from within the company as a whole [26]. On another level, Banerjee [27] highlighted the importance of functional strategies including Research & Development & Innovation (R&D&I). It is important to remember that managers face growing demand to develop not only new, environmentally-friendly products [28][29][30][31], but also new processes, which in recent decades have then been incorporated into the supply chain [32] with their subsequent effect on cost-based competitive advantages.…”

Does Thinking Style Make a Difference in Environmental Perception and Orientation? Evidence from Entrepreneurs in Post-Sanction Iran

“…Furthermore, these types of firms provide formal environmental training for their employees [21]. Recently established firms with a strong external environmental orientation pursue more proactive environmental strategies and integrate environmental issues at higher levels of strategy [42], and the founders of such firms are more concerned about how to satisfy the environmental demands of external stakeholders, e.g., consumers, supplier, alliance firms, government, and community [41].…”

The Impact of Strategic Human Resources Management to Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment in Manufacturing Company

“…Environmental orientation reflects the extent of companies in committing protection to the environment, which comes from their willingness to recognize and integrate environmental concerns into business strategy (Banerjee et al, 2003). Based on empirical research conducted by Banerjee (2002), it was reported that the environmental orientation may be focused internally or externally.…”