2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.896518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Finance in Europe: A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the main stylised facts about the payout policies of US firms also characterise the payout policies of European companies (see, e.g., Bancel et al , 2005; Degeorge and Maug, 2006, ). Most notably, in many European markets, researchers observe the same close connection between the decision to pay dividends and a firm's current profitability, size, growth prospects, and mix of earned and contributed capital as in US firms (see, e.g., Denis and Osobov, 2006; von Eije and Megginson, 2006).…”
Section: The Full Payout Model As the Foundation Of A Positive Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the main stylised facts about the payout policies of US firms also characterise the payout policies of European companies (see, e.g., Bancel et al , 2005; Degeorge and Maug, 2006, ). Most notably, in many European markets, researchers observe the same close connection between the decision to pay dividends and a firm's current profitability, size, growth prospects, and mix of earned and contributed capital as in US firms (see, e.g., Denis and Osobov, 2006; von Eije and Megginson, 2006).…”
Section: The Full Payout Model As the Foundation Of A Positive Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If governance does improve, then we have strong evidence that bonding is occurring and that it is effective. Degeorge and Maug (2008) arrive at a similar conclusion in their review of the European evidence on the bonding hypothesis. They conclude that less indirect evidence and more direct testing is needed to settle the debate over the ability of bonding to explain the corporate crosslisting decision.…”
Section: Summary and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… Degeorge and Maug (2008) observe that corporate bonding in a purely domestic context can be first attributed to Gordon (1988) who contends that listing on the NYSE commits the firm to only a single class of shares and thus can eliminate the wedge between voting and cash flow rights resulting from a dual class share structure. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%