2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfir.12159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and Dividend Payout Policy: Beyond Country‐level Governance

Abstract: We address the mixed empirical findings on how corporate governance affects dividend payout policy by analyzing a large sample of firms from 30 countries. Our results indicate that firms with better firm‐level governance pay more dividends, even after controlling for country‐level governance. However, this relation is pronounced only in countries with low shareholder rights. In addition, we find that when the shareholder rights index is high, firm‐level governance is unrelated to dividend payout in the full sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In columns 3, 5, 6 and 7, we include the index of shareholder rights (SR) calculated by La Porta et al (2000aPorta et al ( , 2000b, and used more recently by Lepetit et al (2018) and Chang et al (2018). Contrary to our third hypothesis, the negative and significant coefficients of the SR variable lend support to the substitution hypothesis such that dividends may act as a substitute mechanism to make up for poorer legal shareholder protection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In columns 3, 5, 6 and 7, we include the index of shareholder rights (SR) calculated by La Porta et al (2000aPorta et al ( , 2000b, and used more recently by Lepetit et al (2018) and Chang et al (2018). Contrary to our third hypothesis, the negative and significant coefficients of the SR variable lend support to the substitution hypothesis such that dividends may act as a substitute mechanism to make up for poorer legal shareholder protection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These authors introduce two alternative hypotheses regarding the agency theory of dividends. The outcome hypothesis predicts that firms in countries with better shareholder rights pay more dividends in order to disgorge cash and decrease the free cash flow (Chang, Dutta, Saadi, & Zhu, 2018). The opposite argument is to consider the legal framework as a substitute, namely the substitution hypothesis, with dividends being a way to make up for poor shareholder protection in order to keep open the option of raising external capital in the future.…”
Section: Dividends and Institutional And Legal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Fidrmuc and Jacob (2010) concurred that culture is an important factor in assessing the different dividend policies of different firms around the world. Zheng and Ashraf (2014) and Chang et al . (2018) examined the association of three dimensions of national culture and dividend policies of banks and find that the significant impact of the dimensions on dividend policies.…”
Section: National Culture and Corporate Financial Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, Fidrmuc and Jacob (2010) concurred that culture is an important factor in assessing the different dividend policies of different firms around the world. Zheng and Ashraf (2014) and Chang et al (2018) examined the association of three dimensions of national culture and dividend policies of banks and find that the significant impact of the dimensions on dividend policies. They asserted that societies that are more inclined to long-term orientation, high uncertainty avoidance and low masculinity are reluctant to pay dividends or prefer to pay reduced dividends.…”
Section: Other Dimensions and National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, researchers indicate that country-level cultural variables may capture other factors, such as governances, creditor rights and stock market development in a country (Bae, Chang and Kang, 2012;Stulz and Williamson, 2003). Chang et al (2018) indicate that cross-country studies generally support La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer's (2000) outcome model of a positive relation between country-level governance and dividend, whereas studies at country levels are inconclusive about the relationship between corporate governance and dividend. Additionally, Davaadorj (2019) and Hasan et al (2021) use US data and show that social capital positively affects dividends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%