2017
DOI: 10.22547/ber/9.4.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and Downside Systematic Risk with a Moderating Role of Socio-Political in Pakistan

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this result, H2 is accepted, which supports the agency theory viewpoint. Previous studies such as Wang et al (2015), Hussain and Amir Shah (2017) and Akbar et al (2017) also showed negative and significant impact of board independence on the downside risk and total risk exposure of the firms. The coefficients of director's ownership are also reported in Tables 4-6, which are negative and statistically significant at 1%, 5% or 10% in all the study samples.…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Generalized Methods Of Moment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to this result, H2 is accepted, which supports the agency theory viewpoint. Previous studies such as Wang et al (2015), Hussain and Amir Shah (2017) and Akbar et al (2017) also showed negative and significant impact of board independence on the downside risk and total risk exposure of the firms. The coefficients of director's ownership are also reported in Tables 4-6, which are negative and statistically significant at 1%, 5% or 10% in all the study samples.…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Generalized Methods Of Moment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Contrary to the agency theory, the stewardship theory proposes that managers are good stewards of firm's resources, and dual position provides an opportunity to the managers to work with complete authority and responsibility, which ultimately affects the firm performance and reduces the organizational risk (Donaldson and Davis, 1994). Previous studies such as Akbar et al (2017) and Hussain and Amir Shah (2017) found that CEO duality reduces the organizational risk. CEO duality in the asset management firms can also reduce the mutual fund risk, as it reduces the firm's risk.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…board size, independent directors and CEO duality) changes their predicted theoretical behavior on firm performance mechanism. Thirdly, the results of the current study can also be generalized to the developing economies of this region which are suffering due to poor corporate governance mechanism (Hussain and Amir Shah, 2018). Lastly, majority of the previous studies in the Pakistani context (Abbas et al , 2018; Afza et al , 2015; Kamran and Shah, 2014; Rafique et al , 2017) used panel data estimation techniques (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%