Corporate Governance and Firm Risk: Evidence from Malaysian Shariah Compliance Companies

Ismail, Aida Maria; Ismail, Cik Rabiah; Sulaiman, Saliza; Daud, Dalila

doi:10.18488/journal.73.2020.82.169.193

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 78 publications

(156 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The observed attribute of the nomination and remuneration committee is the existence of a committee (Borlea et al, 2017;Eulaiwi et al, 2016;Harymawan et al, 2019;Hutchinson et al, 2015;Kanapathippillai et al, 2016;Kent et al, 2021;Puni and Anlesinya, 2020;Ruigrok et al, 2006;Saha and Kabra, 2022), independent director (board) presence and committee independence (Ashraf et al, 2022;Eulaiwi et al, 2016;Ismail et al, 2020;Nyambia and Hamdan, 2018;Vinjamury, 2020), gender diversity on the committee (Alkalbani et al, 2019;Kaczmarek et al, 2012;Mans-Kemp and Viviers, 2019), diversity of nationality and race on the committee (Kaczmarek et al, 2012;Mans-Kemp and Viviers, 2019;Ruigrok et al, 2006), number of members and frequency of committee meetings (Appiah and Chizema, 2016;Kanapathippillai et al, 2016), expertise, experience, monitoring and independence of the committee chairman (Chaudhry et al, 2020) and committee effectiveness or quality (Appiah and Chizema, 2016;Kanapathippillai et al, 2016Kanapathippillai et al, , 2019.…”

Section: Dimensions Of the Nomination And Remuneration Committeementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nomination and remuneration committee: a review of literature

Putra,

Setiawan

2024

JCMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to synthesize the diverse literature on nomination and remuneration committees and provide avenues for future research.Design/methodology/approachThis study provides a comprehensive literature review of theoretical and empirical studies published in reputable international journals indexed by Scopus.FindingsThe literature review reveals several aspects of the nomination and remuneration committee. These aspects have been classified into the definition of the nomination and remuneration committee, dimensions of the nomination and remuneration committee, measurement and research review results, reasons for conflict empirical findings, company dynamics and research on moderators, as well as recommending future research.Research limitations/implicationsOur literature review shows that nomination and remuneration committees play a role in improving board performance and company performance, reducing agency conflicts and improving corporate governance to provide implications for companies, regulators and investors and pave the way for future research.Originality/valueThis paper identifies issues related to nomination and remuneration committees, their theoretical and practical implications and avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: Dimensions Of the Nomination And Remuneration Committeementioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2022; Eulaiwi et al. , 2016; Ismail et al. , 2020; Nyambia and Hamdan, 2018; Vinjamury, 2020), gender diversity on the committee (Alkalbani et al.…”

Section: Dimensions Of the Nomination And Remuneration Committeementioning

confidence: 99%

Nomination and remuneration committee: a review of literature

Putra,

Setiawan

2024

JCMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Compliance is a topic that is currently addressed in specific economical contexts. Literature covers tax compliance (Araújo Marques et al, 2020;D'Attoma et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Robbins and Kiser, 2020), trade compliance (Baier et al, 2020), compliance with labor regulations (Dávalos et al, 2020) and labor standards (Pike, 2020), reporting standards (Tsalavoutas et al, 2020) and also islamic shariah compliance (Farooq and Pashayev, 2020;Ismail et al, 2020;Satt et al, 2020). The body of current literature on compliance also investigates IT security and data governance (Johannsen et al, 2020) as well as the impact of several factors on IT or information security compliance, such as different communication approaches (Barlow et al, 2018) and the role of leadership (Feng et al, 2019;Paliszkiewicz, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compliance and Organizations – How Can Organizations Enable Compliance?

Gierl¹

2021

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Management, Business and Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of compliance for companies is obvious, as compliance violations can have farreaching consequences. Numerous scandal reports in press testify the general interest of society in compliance. The question arises, how companies can promote compliance in organizations. Up to now, too little attention seems to be paid to a current and comprehensive overview of compliance drivers in organizations. This gap is addressed by providing a systematic literature review (SLR) on factors that enable compliance within an organization. The 7-S framework of organizations, developed by Waterman et al. (1980) responds to the problem of multiplicity of factors that also need to be considered when implementing compliance in organizations and was therefore used as the theoretical underpinning of this paper. The results of this SLR show, that there are already various starting points for "hard" and "soft" organizational success factors of compliance in the individual areas of an organization. Especially "soft" organizational factors, such as culture, staff and organizational skills seem to be important for long term success in compliance. This paper is not only relevant for compliance officers and compliance responsible persons, but also for compliance researchers, as several limitations demonstrate the need for further qualitative and quantitative research.

show abstract

The Impact of the Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Insurance Risk: Perspective from Insurance Industry

Abebe,

Dhaliwal

2024

Review of Middle East Economics and Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the correlation between corporate governance mechanisms and insurance risk in Ethiopian insurance companies. The study employed various multivariate regression approaches, including fixed effects, random effects models, and two-step system GMM. The study analyzed 136 observations from 17 insurance firms, with one omitted due to lack of data. The research used two regression models to examine the link between corporate governance mechanisms and insurance risk. Having independent directors on the board was discovered to have a notable and unfavorable influence on operational risk, whereas the size of the board did not impact operational or liquidity risk. The frequency of board meetings did not show a significant relationship with operational risk, but it did have a notable positive correlation with liquidity risk. Audit committees were found to have a negative and significant influence on both operational and liquidity risk. Gender diversity on the board had an insignificant but negative effect on insurance risk, mainly operational risk. Overall, the study emphasized the importance of independent directors and audit committees in managing risk in Ethiopian insurance companies. This research provides valuable insights for academic policymakers, such as the National Bank of Ethiopia, insurance companies, and other organizations.

show abstract

Corporate Governance and Firm Risk: Evidence from Malaysian Shariah Compliance Companies

Cited by 4 publications

References 78 publications

Nomination and remuneration committee: a review of literature

Nomination and remuneration committee: a review of literature

Compliance and Organizations – How Can Organizations Enable Compliance?

The Impact of the Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Insurance Risk: Perspective from Insurance Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About