2018
DOI: 10.1111/fire.12161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and Firm Survival

Abstract: We explore how various aspects of corporate governance influence the likelihood of a public corporation surviving as a separate public entity, after addressing potential endogeneity that arises from competing corporate exit outcomes: acquisitions, going-private transactions, and bankruptcies. We find that some corporate governance features are more important determinants of the form of a firm's exit than many economic factors that have figured prominently in prior research. We also find evidence that outsider-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…shareholder governance." 39 Kress further argues, "The directors of the United States' largest financial institutions are too busy to execute their governance roles effectively." 40 Independent directors must be unburdened by excessive other work to create value and promote a safe and sound institution.…”
Section: Risk Index = (Tier One Capital + Mean Roa -Regulatory Threshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shareholder governance." 39 Kress further argues, "The directors of the United States' largest financial institutions are too busy to execute their governance roles effectively." 40 Independent directors must be unburdened by excessive other work to create value and promote a safe and sound institution.…”
Section: Risk Index = (Tier One Capital + Mean Roa -Regulatory Threshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that there is a substantial difference between large and small firms in terms of probabilities to exit, because small firms are more likely to operate below the minimum efficient scale and therefore more likely to exit the market. Adopting the perspective that there exists a radical difference in survival probability between small and large firms, due essentially to larger availability of different kinds of resources, we find among our articles those concentrating only on quoted firms (Dawley et al, 2002;Bhattacharjee et al, 2009;Goktan et al, 2018;Ovtchinnikov, 2013), and others only on small firms (Kim et al, 2015;Sakai et al, 2010).…”
Section: Micro Factorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other recurrent perspectives were the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities (e.g., Bruyaka & Durand, 2012), resource dependence theory (e.g., Gras & Mendoza-Abarca, 2014), and internationalization theories (e.g., Colantone & Sleuwaegen, 2010). In various instances, scholars preferred to rely on specific exit and survival literature rather than on theories and perspectives (e.g., Goktan et al, 2018). Where possible, we also distinguished papers based on their unit of observation, not surprisingly the vast majority (82) focused on firms (e.g., Bernard et al, 2017;Furr & Kapoor, 2018), 9 on sectors (e.g., Johansson, 2005), and 6 focused on countries, regions, or provinces (e.g., Bosma et al, 2011).…”
Section: Production and Operations Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos trabajos comunican que los desequilibrios financieros son un factor explicativo de la predisposición a aceptar ofertas de absorción: las empresas absorbidas son frecuentemente disfuncionales (Kennedy, 2000), y perciben estos acuerdos como una salida estratégica (Bernile et al, 2012) que evita la quiebra y minimiza el riesgo de que acreedores y propietarios inicien reclamaciones de daños (Rose-Green y Dawkins, 2002). Específicamente, Goktan et al (2018) sugieren que las absorciones y las ofertas públicas de exclusión deben incluirse en la categoría de fracaso. A la vista de todo ello, hemos clasificado a las empresas absorbidas como fallecidas en la fecha en que se adopta el acuerdo de fusión.…”
Section: Datosunclassified
“…En tanto que intangibles, su identificación objetiva plantea un importante problema experimental (Holsapple y Wu, 2011). Algunos trabajos han explorado distintos aspectos de lo que, en un sentido muy amplio, podemos denominar la calidad de gestión y gobierno corporativos (Goktan et al, 2018). Estas propiedades señalizan buenas prácticas, refuerzan la reputación y mitigan la incertidumbre de los restantes agentes económicos, atenuando el riesgo de que adopten acciones defensivas que, como la adición de primas por riesgo (Deng et al, 2014), la exigencia de colaterales o la denegación de crédito (Klein y Leffler, 1981;Berkowitz y White, 2004), podrían llegar a causar un fallo por sí solas (Lee et al, 2007;Ucbasaran et al, 2013).…”
Section: Variables Independientesunclassified