Corporate Governance and Strategic Decision Making 2017
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and Fraud: Evolution and Considerations

Abstract: There are many definitions of Corporate Governance, as a structure, as process, as policies, as mechanisms, but despite their differences of focus, they mainly addressed the sustainable economic growth and protection of shareholders and other stakeholder's rights. The purpose here is to present the evolution of the main principles and frameworks as corporate and financial environment changes and set new challenges. Some important scandals that revealed the weaknesses of corporate governance frameworks are desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for corporate governance dates back to the time when the corporate form of business worked to minimize the potential conflict of interest between corporate owners and managers and contributed to enhanced value (Berle & Means, 1932). The disturbing regularity of high-profile financial scandals and the debilitating recent global financial crisis have contributed to the renewed interest and added relevance of governance quality of companies in general and banks in particular (da Costa, 2017). The corporate governance of banks remains highly pertinent in the face of accentuated information asymmetry, diluted monitoring capacity amidst opaque banking activities, highly leveraged business resulting in strict scrutiny, conflicting goals of stakeholders and unique agency issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for corporate governance dates back to the time when the corporate form of business worked to minimize the potential conflict of interest between corporate owners and managers and contributed to enhanced value (Berle & Means, 1932). The disturbing regularity of high-profile financial scandals and the debilitating recent global financial crisis have contributed to the renewed interest and added relevance of governance quality of companies in general and banks in particular (da Costa, 2017). The corporate governance of banks remains highly pertinent in the face of accentuated information asymmetry, diluted monitoring capacity amidst opaque banking activities, highly leveraged business resulting in strict scrutiny, conflicting goals of stakeholders and unique agency issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the above, corporate accounting fraud is evidenced by the devastating high-profile corporate failures such as Enron, WorldCom, Satyam Computers that occurred around the globe (Kankanamage, 2015). One of the key causes of the aforementioned corporate failures, and many such others, was the materially misrepresented financial statements via malfeasance accounting practices, due to the lack of monitoring by the stakeholders (Mamo & Aliaz, 2014;da Costa, 2017). Thus, the regulators throughout the world started to focus on corporate governance mechanisms, especially the ownership structure dimensions to enhance the quality of financial reporting (Al-Fayoumi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unethical behaviours or conduct in businesses have received significant attention, and ethical values have been questionable since the global corporate scandals. The event of international corporate scandals, such as Enron and WorldCom, occurred because of poor practices of corporate governance and ethical standards (Costa, 2017). Asian countries, including Malaysia, are also experiencing a similar issue, mainly involving top-level management abusing their position for self-interest (Palation, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%