Corporate governance and risk reporting: Indian evidence

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to measure the extent of voluntary risk disclosure and examine the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration’s impact on risk disclosure in the annual reports of Indian listed companies. Design/methodology/approach The method adopted in this study is automated content analysis, which is applied to a sample of 100 listed Indian non-financial companies to find out the extent of risk disclosure. Further, multiple linear regressions have been applied to find out the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics, ownership concentration and risk disclosure. Findings The findings reveal that the total number of positive risk keywords surpasses negative risk keywords disclosure. The corporate governance mainsprings, namely, board size and gender diversity have a positively significant effect on risk disclosure, whereas ownership concentration in the hands of the largest shareholder insignificantly affects risk disclosure, but identity of the largest shareholder having ownership concentration negatively affects disclosure of risk information in the case of Indian promoter body corporate, foreign promoter body corporate and non-institutions in comparison to family ownership. Research limitations/implications This study relied on a set of 39 risk keywords for measuring the extent of risk disclosure. Further, it uses a sample of 100 companies to examine the effect of corporate governance on risk disclosure at one point of time. However, a longitudinal study can help in understanding risk disclosure adopted by Indian listed companies in a better manner. Practical implications The findings have implications for regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which needs to strengthen corporate governance norms with respect to board characteristics and keep a check on ownership concentration for improving risk disclosure by companies. Originality/value To best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is a preliminary attempt linking two research lines in India, that is, corporate risk disclosure and corporate governance quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration. The study identifies corporate governance firm level qualities which lead to divulgation of risk information by the companies pointing towards strengthening of regulatory regime in the country for improved corporate governance regulations adopted by listed companies.

Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure—De Facto and De Jure Evidence

“…Furthermore, one the most disclosed content elements is Principal Risks and Their Management, with a score of 0.90 (45 companies out of 50 report this item). Also, this value is higher than the values obtained in previous research [58,59] and can be read in light of the dissatisfaction shown by investors and stakeholders in recent years regarding several corporate scandals and failures, such as those of Enron, Worldcom, and Adelphia, with respect to the general level of risk and risk management disclosure provided by the companies [44,79,80]. Indeed, for investors and stakeholders, a higher level of risk disclosure allows for conducting a better assessment of the risk profile of a company by reducing the equity cost and improving the market efficiency [44,46,81].…”

The Emergence Of Human Capital Disclosure: Exploring The Influence Of Board Composition

“…The presence of women directors can increase the frequency and volume in regards to continuous disclosure towards the capital market. This is because women directors encourage more active monitoring and enhance the information environment (Saggar & Singh, 2017). This shows that there is a positive link between the presence of women in a board composition and disclosures.…”

Relationship between Corporate Governance and Risk Disclosure Practice from Malaysia Perspective

“…In response to upturn demand for better risk information disclosure has motivated past studies to further investigate factors who might affect the company risk disclosure (Saggar & Singh, 2017). However, these studies arguably experience some limitations who may open for further research.…”