2020
DOI: 10.1108/cg-08-2019-0259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance and underpricing of small and medium enterprises IPOs in India

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of the paper is to examine the impact of corporate governance mechanisms, i.e. board structure and ownership structure on the underpricing of small and medium enterprises (SME) IPOs in India. Design/methodology/approach Most of the extant empirical research studies have either pivoted on mainstream IPOs or SMEs IPOs in developed economies, but the present study examines 200 SME IPOs issued during Feb 2012 to April 2017. Multiple regressions have been used to examine the impact of the corp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an opportunity to increase educational equityin the midst of these challenging timesby addressing the digital divide head-on, affirmatively examining inequities and investing in solutions that support access to and resilience of learning opportunities for all students across the country. To assist address the digital divide and allied accessibility issues, internet operators should ensure that internet connectivity is strong and also reduce the cost of internet bundles as Arora and Singh (2020) suggest that Indian investors should come forward and investment decisions in small-and medium-sized educational firms as well. The government should assist students to get laptops and tablets/smartphones as some students rated challenges with phones/laptops and connectivity as an important item.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an opportunity to increase educational equityin the midst of these challenging timesby addressing the digital divide head-on, affirmatively examining inequities and investing in solutions that support access to and resilience of learning opportunities for all students across the country. To assist address the digital divide and allied accessibility issues, internet operators should ensure that internet connectivity is strong and also reduce the cost of internet bundles as Arora and Singh (2020) suggest that Indian investors should come forward and investment decisions in small-and medium-sized educational firms as well. The government should assist students to get laptops and tablets/smartphones as some students rated challenges with phones/laptops and connectivity as an important item.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grounded on the corporate governance literature which professes that the endogeneity issues may engender biased and inconsistent estimates while examining the relationship between governance variables and organisational outcomes, the current study uses a two-stage least square estimator (2SLS) to address such issues. Backed by the prior research studies (Mak and Li, 2001; Larcker et al , 2007; Arora and Singh, 2020), it has been ascertained that board independence is endogenous which could lead to erroneous interpretation of data. As a result, the study used an instrumental variable approach to account for potential endogeneity that could skew our findings.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited research has focused on developing economies and how their typical governance structures differ from developed economies is still unclear. Various studies examining the impact of board structure and ownership structure on IPO underpricing, particularly in the Indian setting (Anand and Singh, 2019; Arora and Singh, 2020; Handa and Singh, 2017), are largely prescriptive and only analyse the direct link between the concerned variables. A significant research gap exists concerning the role of moderating variables in influencing organisational performance, especially IPO underpricing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had the choice of either using a measure that past studies have used or create a new measure. Past studies have measured CG by various indicators such as board-based indicators (Arora and Sharma, 2016; Arora and Singh, 2020; Chen et al , 2006; Mathew et al , 2017), presence (or absence) of antitakeover mechanisms and the state of incorporation (Gillan et al , 2003; Bebchuk et al , 2009). In the US, states make their antitakeover laws sometimes.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%