2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-44955-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance in Bangladesh: A Comparison with Other Emerging Market Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we argue that our measures of attitude towards whistleblowing, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control have face validity in that the survey items being used in this study reasonably capture what each whistleblowing belief intends to measure and reflect the unique nature of whistleblowing in the context of the U.S. federal government (e.g., considering external referents in shaping the focal individual's subjective norm). Moreover, our approach is consistent with several whistleblowing studies that have used parsimonious measures of whistleblowing beliefs instead of multiplicative ones (Chang et al, 2017;Cho & Song, 2015;Chudzicka-Czupała et al, 2016;Ferdous et al, 2014;Latan et al, 2018;Rustiarini & Sunarsih, 2017).…”
Section: Variablessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we argue that our measures of attitude towards whistleblowing, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control have face validity in that the survey items being used in this study reasonably capture what each whistleblowing belief intends to measure and reflect the unique nature of whistleblowing in the context of the U.S. federal government (e.g., considering external referents in shaping the focal individual's subjective norm). Moreover, our approach is consistent with several whistleblowing studies that have used parsimonious measures of whistleblowing beliefs instead of multiplicative ones (Chang et al, 2017;Cho & Song, 2015;Chudzicka-Czupała et al, 2016;Ferdous et al, 2014;Latan et al, 2018;Rustiarini & Sunarsih, 2017).…”
Section: Variablessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As we mentioned earlier, the items used to measure these constructs are not entirely consistent with the original operationalizations by Ajzen (1991). Although our measurement approach is aligned with those of previous studies that have used more parsimonious measures of whistleblowing-related beliefs (Chang et al, 2017; Cho & Song, 2015; Chudzicka-Czupała et al, 2016; Ferdous et al, 2014; Latan et al, 2018; Rustiarini & Sunarsih, 2017), we acknowledge that there is room for improvement in terms of operationalizing and measuring these variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Firstly, the Pakistani firms do not have a large number of members on the board as compared to the firms in the other neighboring countries. As per the findings of this study, the average board size is 8 whereas the board size in India is 13 and in Bangladesh is 16 (Ferdous et al, 2014). Since the low board size is considered less effective due to less diversity, experience and skills involved, therefore, the current study contends that the reason for the insignificant role might be the low board size in Pakistan.…”
Section: Board Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Since the low board size is considered less effective due to less diversity, experience and skills involved, therefore, the current study contends that the reason for the insignificant role might be the low board size in Pakistan. Secondly, the average number of non-executive directors on the board is 2.67 in the Pakistani firms as compared to India where the ratio is 4 (Ferdous et al, 2014). Likewise, the ratio of outsiders on the board is 69 percent as shown in table 1 of the current study.…”
Section: Board Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Given the importance of deregulation, globalization, increasing risk, and investor protection, as well as the positive role of the banking sector in economic growth, corporate governance has significant importance for the sustainability of the banking industry, because corporate governance practices help to build sustainable value for the banking industry (Yatim and Yusoff 2014). Both the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD 1999) and Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS 1999;BCBS 2006) produced and made recommendations regarding the best corporate governance practices for a sound financial system, which is important for sustained economic growth (de Andres and Vallelado 2008;Ferdous et al 2014). Following the OECD and Basel committee recommendations, many countries, including Pakistan 1 , developed their own guidelines for the best corporate governance practices in order to monitor and enhance the performance of their banking system and to protect shareholder 1 Initially, in 2002, the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), in collaboration with United Nation Development Program (UNDP), started a project which involved developing, designing, and implementing the code of corporate governance in order to improve best corporate governance practices in the country (SECP 2004) for the sustainable growth of industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%