2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance, violations and market reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() examine the stock market reaction to the Chinese split share reform. Kouwenberg and Phunnarungsi () provide an analysis of market reaction to corporate governance violations. Brown and Davis () discuss the optimal design of off‐market share repurchases, while Akyol et al .…”
Section: Relevance To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…() examine the stock market reaction to the Chinese split share reform. Kouwenberg and Phunnarungsi () provide an analysis of market reaction to corporate governance violations. Brown and Davis () discuss the optimal design of off‐market share repurchases, while Akyol et al .…”
Section: Relevance To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the lack of effective monitoring by the board since the chairman is also the CEO of the company. A more recent study in Thailand by Kouwenberg and Phunnarungsi (2013) also found that the market reaction to the company in Thailand enforcement action is less serious when there is separation between the chairman and CEO of the company. Based on the findings of previous studies, this study expects the following relationship:…”
Section: Board Independence and Public Reprimandmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Song and Han (2017) examined the impact of corporate crime on the stock market in South Korea and found negative reactions to stock prices around the announcements. They found no significant difference in reactions between announcements of individual and organisational crimes followed the inferences of Kouwenberg and Phunnarungsi (2013). In Germany, Ewelt-Knauer et al (2015) indicated that shareholder wealth decreases more if at least one board member resigns due to the fraud case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%