Corporate land acquisitions at the intersection of lineage and patronage networks in Cameroon

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of literature on large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA) in Africa, few empirical studies exist on how patronage networks combine with socio-cultural stratification to determine the livelihood outcomes for African agrarian-based communities. This article draws from ethnographic research on Cameroon to contribute to bridging this gap. We argue that lineage and patronage considerations intersect to determine beneficiaries and losers during LSLA. Second, we show that LSLA tend to re-entrench existing inequalities in power relations that exist within communities in favour of people with traceable ancestral lineage. Concomitantly, non-indigenous groups especially migrants, bear the brunt of exclusion and are unfortunately exposed to severe livelihood stresses due to their inability to leverage patronage networks and political power to defend their interests. We submit that empirical examination of the impacts of land acquisitions should consider the centrality of power and patronage networks between indigenes and non-indigenes, and how this socio-cultural dichotomy restricts and/or mediates land acquisition outcomes in Cameroon.

Intimate exclusion and pastoralist elites' role in large scale-land acquisition in Kenya

“…Third, recent large-scale land acquisition studies focus on singular-type acquisitions (such as green energy or crude oil) that governments or transnational corporations predominantly control (Achiba 2019; Ndi et al . 2021). However, it is essential to consider the interconnectedness of different types of control of large amounts of land, including those involving reworking rules of access, as they tend to reinforce each other and have compound implications for affected populations (Bluwstein et al .…”

Power and conviction dynamics on land and linked natural resources: explorative insights from the greater south region of Cameroon

“…The constitution created panic amongst potential migrants, leading to the rise of political and tribal squabbles to secure a greater share of state resources (Ndi, 2017). This was achieved in most cases, by excluding "outsiders" (Ndi et al, 2021(Ndi et al, , 2022. Political elites from different regional settings were pitted against each other, in a rat race for ethnic hegemony.…”