Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace

Boddy, Clive R.

doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0689-5

Cited by 189 publications

(155 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

139

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other studies have linked high Machiavellianism to a tendency to engage in counterproductive work behaviors, which includes harmful interpersonal acts similar to abuse (Dahling et al, 2009), and bullying at work (Pilch and Turska, 2015). Leader psychopathy has been negatively related to individual consideration (Westerlaken and Woods, 2013), and positively associated with corporate misbehavior (Clarke, 2005), workplace bullying, and unfair supervision (Boddy, 2011). For narcissists a more nuanced picture seems to arise from the literature.…”

Section: Dark Triad Traits and Their Relationship With Abusive Supervmentioning

confidence: 99%

When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams

Wisse

Sleebos²

2016

Personality and Individual Differences

117

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oPrevious work has focused on the potential maladaptive consequences of the Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism) in organizational contexts. This research builds upon this work, examining the influence of supervisor position power on the relationship between supervisor Dark Triad traits and abusive supervision in teams. Regression analysis on the data of 225 teams revealed that supervisor Machiavellianism is positively related to abusive supervision in work teams, but only when supervisors perceive their position power to be high rather than low. We discuss how power may function as an amplifier, bringing behavioral consequences of predispositions, emotions and beliefs to the forefront. We also focus on the value of differentiating between the three Dark Triad traits in order to more fully understand how they may relate to the abuse of employees.

show abstract

Section: Dark Triad Traits and Their Relationship With Abusive Supervmentioning

confidence: 99%

When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams

Wisse

Sleebos²

2016

Personality and Individual Differences

117

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Stout considers sociopaths as having no conscience and, consequently, having no limits on their behavior, other than avoiding a context that would reduce their ability to do what they please and feel no responsibility or obligation to anyone except themselves. Boddy preferred the term psychopath (Boddy, 2005(Boddy, , 2011a(Boddy, , 2011b.…”

Section: Social Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Social Intelligence and the Explanation of Workplace Abuse

Popp¹

2017

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bullying in the workplace by management-level supervisors and executives has been well documented in the literature; however, bullying of employees by their associates is often less noticeable, even stealth, and has been understudied. This article presents a theoretical model that draws from the literature of clinical psychology and recent research in neuroscience to identify and describe the four different roles played in employee workplace colleague abuse. These roles include (1) the leader of the abuse, (2) the targeted employee, (3) members of the mob who bully the targeted employee under the direction of the abuse leader, and (4) participants in a whisper campaign. To understand the motivations of employees who intentionally cause an associate distress or illness, it is necessary to understand these distinct roles.

show abstract

“…Their strategies are to charm superiors; charm, manipulate or tolerate peers; abuse and manipulate subordinates (Boddy, 2011a). Other traits include; callousness, irresponsibility, impulsiveness, ability to make persuasive arguments, poor decision-making and poor performance.…”

Section: Corporate Psychopathymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Citing the instance of the Enron scandal, Boddy (2011b) theorizes that corporate psychopaths are principally responsible for the unethical practices that led to the global financial crises in the late 2000s. Large scale Ponzi schemes, frauds, embezzlements (Babiak et al, 2010) and several counterproductive workplace outcomes (Boddy, 2011a;Mathieu et al, 2014;Wellons, 2012) are credited to the sinister presence of corporate psychopaths.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Of Predators and Preys: Corporate Psychopathy and Employee Burnout as Parallels

Oyewunmi

Akinnusi

Oyewunmi

2018

Period. Polytech. Soc. Man. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different personalities constitute modern workplaces. One of such personalities is the corporate psychopath, whose presence poses manifold threats to organizational existence. This study examines the personality of the corporate psychopath and specifically investigates the relationship between corporate psychopathy and employee burnout. A total of 104 respondents within a university setting in Nigeria completed measures of corporate psychopathy to establish the existence of the traits in their managers; a self-report measure of employee burnout was also completed. Corporate psychopathy correlates positively and significantly with emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and decreased personal accomplishment. Results indicate that corporate psychopathy is an underlying factor of employee burnout. Enhanced whistleblowing structures and ethical regeneration are proffered to mitigate the consequences of corporate psychopathy in the face of cultural complexes that fan its flames.

show abstract

Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace

Abstract: Corporate Psychopaths, bullying, ethics, toxic leadership, abusive supervision,

Cited by 189 publications

References 48 publications

When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams

When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams

Social Intelligence and the Explanation of Workplace Abuse

Of Predators and Preys: Corporate Psychopathy and Employee Burnout as Parallels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About