The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118335529.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Reputation and the Discipline of Advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forgiveness (a = 0.90, M = 3.09, SD = 0.92), blame (a = 0.89, M = 3.8, SD = 0.82) and endorsement potential (a = 0.83, M = 2.87, SD = 0.96) were adapted from Rifon et al (2014) and measured using four-item, five-point Likert scales asking for degree of agreement/disagreement with statements. Forgiveness ("I am sure I could forgive her for her actions," The items for each scale were as follows, "It is likely that I will forgive her/him for her/his actions," "I believe she/he deserves forgiveness for her/his actions" and "It will be easy to forgive her/him for her/his actions"); Blame ("I am sure I could blame her/him for her/his actions," "It is likely that I would blame her/him for her/his actions," "I believe s/he deserves to be blamed for her/his actions" and "It will be easy to blame her/him for her/his actions"); Endorsement potential ("I cannot believe anyone would buy a product because she/he endorsed it," "If s/he endorsed a product, people might not buy it," "She/he would be a good choice for a product endorser and "She/he would be a terrible choice to endorse a product").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forgiveness (a = 0.90, M = 3.09, SD = 0.92), blame (a = 0.89, M = 3.8, SD = 0.82) and endorsement potential (a = 0.83, M = 2.87, SD = 0.96) were adapted from Rifon et al (2014) and measured using four-item, five-point Likert scales asking for degree of agreement/disagreement with statements. Forgiveness ("I am sure I could forgive her for her actions," The items for each scale were as follows, "It is likely that I will forgive her/him for her/his actions," "I believe she/he deserves forgiveness for her/his actions" and "It will be easy to forgive her/him for her/his actions"); Blame ("I am sure I could blame her/him for her/his actions," "It is likely that I would blame her/him for her/his actions," "I believe s/he deserves to be blamed for her/his actions" and "It will be easy to blame her/him for her/his actions"); Endorsement potential ("I cannot believe anyone would buy a product because she/he endorsed it," "If s/he endorsed a product, people might not buy it," "She/he would be a good choice for a product endorser and "She/he would be a terrible choice to endorse a product").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have begun to examine the effects of the transgression on consumer evaluations of the transgressed celebrity endorser such as attitude toward the endorser (Lee et al, 2021;Thomas and Fowler, 2016;Thwaites et al, 2012) and endorser credibility (Singh et al, 2020;Zhou and Whitla, 2013). To better understand why some celebrities survive transgressions better than others, this study focuses on the celebrity-related outcome, future endorsement potential, defined here as a celebrity's ability to persuade consumers to purchase an endorsed brand (Rifon et al, 2014), and independent of a specific brand endorsement situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent important wine-related social media advertising studies have focused on four major platforms: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and personal blogs/websites (Szolnoki et al , 2014). Rifon et al (2013) studied how social media advertising influences brand reputation. Social media advertising has become the top source of information for persuading people to buy or not buy products.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‫ـكة‬ ‫ـ‬ ‫للرش‬ ‫ـالء‬ ‫العمـ‬ ‫ـيم‬ ‫تقيـ‬ ‫ـري‬ ‫تغيـ‬ ‫ىف‬ ‫باملنافسني‬ ً ‫مقارنا‬ ‫ومنتجاتها‬(Moorthy and Hawkins, 2005) . ‫ـت‬ ‫اتفقـ‬ ‫أنه‬ ‫اال‬ ‫الرشكة،‬ ‫وسمعة‬ ‫االعالن‬ ‫بني‬ ‫تربط‬ ‫أن‬ ‫حاولت‬ ‫التى‬ ‫االبحاث‬ ‫ندرة‬ ‫من‬ ‫الرغم‬ ‫عىل‬ ‫أنه‬ ‫ويالحظ‬ ‫سمعتها،‬ ‫وبني‬ ‫التسويقية‬ ‫الرشكة‬ ‫اتصاالت‬ ‫بني‬ ‫ارتباط‬ ‫وجود‬ ‫عىل‬ ‫اسات‬ ‫الدر‬ ‫بعض‬ ‫حاولت‬ ‫املثال،‬ ‫سبيل‬ ‫فعىل‬ ‫الش‬ ‫سمعة‬ ‫بناء‬ ‫ىف‬ ‫االعالن‬ ‫مساهمة‬ ‫كيفية‬ ‫تفسري‬ ‫االدبيات‬ ‫بعض‬ ‫ـ‬ ‫ـارشة.‬ ‫مبـ‬ ‫ـري‬ ‫غـ‬ ‫أو‬ ‫ـارشة‬ ‫مبـ‬ ‫بصورة‬ ‫سواء‬ ‫ركة‬ ‫ـني‬ ‫تحسـ‬ ‫أو‬ ‫ـاء‬ ‫بنـ‬ ‫ـا‬ ‫بإمكانهـ‬ ‫الذهنية‬ ‫ورتها‬ ‫وعن‬ ‫الرشكة،‬ ‫عن‬ ‫رسائل‬ ‫حمل‬ ‫ميكنه‬ ‫االعالن‬ ‫أن‬ ‫استخلصت‬ ‫وقد‬ ً ‫ـا‬ ‫أيضـ‬ ‫بل‬ ‫فحسب‬ ‫هذا‬ ‫ليس‬ ‫العمالء،‬ ‫لدى‬ ‫الرشكة‬ ‫سمعة‬ ‫ـن‬ ‫عـ‬ ‫ـالح‬ ‫املصـ‬ ‫ـحاب‬ ‫ـ‬ ‫ال‬ ‫ـدركات‬ ‫مـ‬ ‫ـوين‬ ‫تكـ‬ ‫ـة‬ ‫امكانيـ‬ ‫الرشكة‬ ‫سمعة‬(Rifon, Smreker and Kim, 2013) Lee and Hong, 2016;Logan, et al, 2012…”
unclassified