Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure

Abstract

This paper examines corporate responses to climate change in relation to the development of reporting mechanisms for greenhouse gases, more specifically carbon disclosure. It first presents some background and context on the evolution of carbon trading and disclosure, and then develops a conceptual framework using theories of global governance, institutional theory and commensuration to understand the role of carbon disclosure in the emerging climate regime. Subsequently, a closer look is taken at carbon disclosure and reporting mechanisms, with a particular focus on the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). Our analysis of responses shows that CDP has been successfully using institutional investors to urge firms to disclose extensive information about their climate change activities. However, although response rates in terms of numbers of disclosing firms are impressive and growing, neither the level of carbon disclosure that CDP promotes nor the more detailed carbon accounting provide information that is particularly valuable for investors, NGOs or policy makers at this stage. As a project of commensuration, carbon disclosure has achieved some progress in technical terms, but much less with regard to the cognitive and value dimensions.

Sustainable Bonuses: Sign of Corporate Responsibility or Window Dressing?

“…However, the criteria selected by both DSM and TNT seem to be directly relevant to their core business as lower carbon dioxide/greenhouse gas emissions and higher energy efficiency is likely to reduce both costs and risks, and valued by investors concerned about climate change as well (Kolk et al, 2008). Both DSM and TNT have an equal balance between long-term and short-term bonuses and, like AkzoNobel, award half of their variable pay to non-financial targets.…”

The politics of carbon markets: an introduction

“…The majority of the work has been, perhaps unsurprisingly, on the role of business actors in these processes. Some of this is focused on the lobbying by particular industries, for example attempts to enable the inclusion of carbon capture and storage in CDM projects (Vormedal 2008), while others focus more broadly on the role of business coalitions or networks in developing carbon market policies (Pinkse and Kolk 2007, Kolk et al 2008, Meckling 2011a, 2011b, Stephan 2011, Paterson 2012.…”

Towards Sustaining the Status Quo: Business Talk of Sustainability in Finnish Corporate Disclosures 1987–2005

“…The significance of corporate non-financial environmental disclosures, and of carbon reporting in particular, appears to be growing due to increased concerns about the impacts of global climate change (Bebbington and Larrinaga-González, 2008;Kolk, Levy and Pinske, 2008). There is thus a clear need to better understand both the corporate motivations to engage in such reporting and the rhetoric the organisations use in these reports while pursuing particular ends (see e.g.…”