2016
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Scandals and Household Stock Market Participation

Abstract: We show that after the revelation of corporate fraud in a state, household stock market participation in that state decreases. Households decrease holdings in fraudulent as well as non fraudulent firms, even if they do not hold stocks in fraudulent firms. Within a state, households with more lifetime experience of corporate fraud hold less equity. Following the exogenous increase in fraud revelation due to Arthur Andersen's demise, states with more Arthur Andersen clients experience a larger decrease in stock … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to corporate governance propagation, the literature has documented other potential mechanisms through which the negative impacts of fraud may transfer from the fraudulent firms to other firms. For instance, firms may suffer if they are in the same industries as the fraudulent firms (Gleason, Jenkins, & Johnson, ; Goldman, Peyer, & Stefanescu, ; Yuan & Zhang, ) or if they are located near the fraudulent firms (Giannetti & Wang, ; Parsons et al., ). To ensure that our main results are not driven by these other factors, we estimate two more sets of regressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to corporate governance propagation, the literature has documented other potential mechanisms through which the negative impacts of fraud may transfer from the fraudulent firms to other firms. For instance, firms may suffer if they are in the same industries as the fraudulent firms (Gleason, Jenkins, & Johnson, ; Goldman, Peyer, & Stefanescu, ; Yuan & Zhang, ) or if they are located near the fraudulent firms (Giannetti & Wang, ; Parsons et al., ). To ensure that our main results are not driven by these other factors, we estimate two more sets of regressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conjecture is supported by several proposed explanations in the literature contemplating the role of participation costs in solving this puzzle [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, scholars also reflected on behavioral approaches such as risk attitude [15,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]; cognitive ability of households such as financial awareness [34], financial literacy [35], and IQ [36]; and sociological aspects including social interaction [5,8,12], trust [7,11] and shared vision [6,9,10,13]. This study reflects on the articles, considering risk attitude, cognitive ability, and sociological factors to explain the puzzle in stock market participation from the recommended journals in finance such as the Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, Review of Financial Studies, and Review of Finance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For instance, Guiso et al [7], Georgarakos and Pasini [8], and Balloch et al [11] considered trust to explain the limited participation while Georgarakos and Inderst [51] studied the impact of trust on professional financial advice to explain stock market participation. Kumar et al [29] considered the risk attitude and the role of trust in investment decision while Giannetti and Wang [15] provided evidence that the risk attitude on household stock market participation is due to a loss of trust in the stock market. This notion is also motivated from the previous studies about risk aversion [27], uncertainty dispersion [28], and loss aversion [32].…”
Section: Discussion and Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations