2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1594-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
2
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
109
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Simpson and Kohers, 2002;Mackey et al, 2007;Obeidat, 2016). The premise behind this association can be attributed to the fact that firms have established relationships with different stakeholders who have different interests (Erhemjamts et al, 2013). These interests can be satisfied by building a comprehensive corporate strategy that takes into consideration the social implication to address and balance the competing interests of different stakeholders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson and Kohers, 2002;Mackey et al, 2007;Obeidat, 2016). The premise behind this association can be attributed to the fact that firms have established relationships with different stakeholders who have different interests (Erhemjamts et al, 2013). These interests can be satisfied by building a comprehensive corporate strategy that takes into consideration the social implication to address and balance the competing interests of different stakeholders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason behind this positive association may be attributed to the fact that organizations have relationships with many groups including customers, employees, communities, etc other than shareholders alone, and all these stakeholders affect and are affected by the actions of the organization. By balancing and addressing the needs of different shareholders, organizations can become more efficient at responding and adapting to various stakeholder demands [90]. Furthermore, according to firm-ascontract analysis, high organizational performance results from both separate satisfaction of bilateral relationships and the simultaneous coordination and prioritization of multilateral stakeholder interests [88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, according to firm-ascontract analysis, high organizational performance results from both separate satisfaction of bilateral relationships and the simultaneous coordination and prioritization of multilateral stakeholder interests [88]. As a result, focusing on the interests of different stakeholders enhances the organizations competitive advantage and long term value creation [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, by netting the total score on concerns from the strengths' score, a firm with ten strengths and ten concerns across all categories is deemed to have a same level of social responsibility as a firm with one strength and one concern. Erhemjamts et al (2012) argue that this loss in heterogeneity can be mitigated by decomposing the ESG index into its strengths and concerns components. Table 1 presents descriptive statistics of these scores for the sample banks.…”
Section: Research Question 4: How Did the Relation Between Banks' Socmentioning
confidence: 99%