Corporate social responsibility, firm value and life cycle: evidence from Southeast Asian countries

Abstract

PurposeThis study extends related research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) into the less-researched realm of Southeast Asia setting by investigating the role of life cycle stages on the relationship between CSR and firm value.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a sample of 1,247 firm-year observations of firms listed in Southeast Asia from 2012 to 2018. Descriptive, multiple regression and sensitivity analyses are presented in the study.FindingsThe results provide evidence that although CSR and firm value, in general, have a positive relationship, the relationship is contingent on the stages of firm's life cycle. The effect of each CSR dimension on firm value differs across life cycle stages. The social dimension of CSR predicts higher firm value at the introduction and mature stages. The governance dimension affects firm value at the growth and shake-out/decline stages. Moreover, the environmental dimension affects firm value only at the later stage of the life cycle.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is limited to five countries in Southeast Asia, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand from 2012 to 2018. Future studies may explore other countries and investigate the impact of country classification on the relationship between CSR and firm value.Practical implicationsPolicymakers, managers and other decision-makers may have a better understanding of firm's behavior in different life cycle stages. With such understanding, CSR will be successfully adopted in decision making, formulation and implementation of policies.Originality/valueCSR-related research in Southeast Asia remains an under-studied domain, and little attention has been dedicated to different dimensions of CSR and life cycle in the area of CSR-related preference for decision making.

Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure and Indonesian firm value: The moderating effect of profitability and firm’s size

“…The findings of this study strengthen the studies conducted by Servaes and Tamayo (2013);Astuti et al (2018); Laili et al (2019); Amato and Falivena (2019); Seok et al (2019); Kamaliah (2020); Hendratama and Huang (2021) which concluded that CSR disclosure promotes better firm value, indicating that the more social disclosure items and the better the quality of the disclosure, the greater the firms' value.…”

Impact of corporate life cycle on misclassification practices: evidence from IFRS adoption in India

“…Following Hendratama and Huang (2021), we use Dickinson's (2011) classification to classify firms under the high (low) life cycle stage. Dickinson (2011) identified mature (introductory) firms as high (low) stage firms.…”

Cultivating strategic agility – An empirical investigation into best practice

“…The fifth prominent theme unearthed through empirical investigation is corporate sustainability, encompassing socially responsible practices. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in this context zeroes in on practices that not only meet legal requirements and foster local community development but also safeguard the needs of future generations (Hendratama & Huang, 2021). Notably, across all case studies, Best Practice Corporations have exhibited a myriad of actions aimed at bolstering their sustainable performance in governance, societal impact, and environmental stewardship, as depicted in Table 7.…”