2021
DOI: 10.1108/cr-12-2020-0160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness – causality in manufacturing

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the interplay of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and green innovation in boosting competitiveness in manufacturing in an emerging market context. This study adds green innovation as mediator in the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach A model with three second-order constructs is developed and tested, in a sample of 325 managers from manufacturing companies in Ecuador, using quantitative and cross-section methods. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
99
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
99
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, GIP assessment is a more objective tactic to measure an enterprise’s sustainable performance. Finally, current trends in GIP research ( Padilla-Lozano and Collazzo, 2022 ) have led to a renewed interest in the function of green innovation management in the emerging markets ( Ji et al, 2019 ; Ji and Miao, 2020 ). In addition, most studies focus on how the inner and outer factors such as stakeholders ( Chang, 2016 ; Hadj, 2020 ), corporate governance ( Yi et al, 2012 ; Honoré et al, 2015 ), social value ( Broadstock et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2021 ), and evaluation system ( Borger and Kruglianskas, 2006 ; Yang et al, 2016 ) affect CSR activities and innovation performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, GIP assessment is a more objective tactic to measure an enterprise’s sustainable performance. Finally, current trends in GIP research ( Padilla-Lozano and Collazzo, 2022 ) have led to a renewed interest in the function of green innovation management in the emerging markets ( Ji et al, 2019 ; Ji and Miao, 2020 ). In addition, most studies focus on how the inner and outer factors such as stakeholders ( Chang, 2016 ; Hadj, 2020 ), corporate governance ( Yi et al, 2012 ; Honoré et al, 2015 ), social value ( Broadstock et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2021 ), and evaluation system ( Borger and Kruglianskas, 2006 ; Yang et al, 2016 ) affect CSR activities and innovation performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling was perceptibly significant, as it considered all companies with profiles on Instagram ® , whose sum includes 80% of the entire sector (Table 4). In practice, our study outperformed the recent market contributions with relevant samples driven by interviews such as Arnold et al [50], Bıçakcıo glu-Peynirci and Tanyeri [51], Dhaundiyal and Coughlan [52], Fan et al [53], Förster et al [54], Le et al [55], Mukti et al [56], Padilla-Lozano and Collazzo [57], Saabye et al [58], Schnurr et al [59], and others.…”
Section: Company Prospection Sectoral Sampling and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…CSR practices are also influenced by marketing and innovation strategies (Chaudhri, 2016;Padilla-Lozano & Collazzo, 2021;Revuelto-Taboada et al, 2021). For example, Pergelova & Angulo-Ruiz (2013) considered that green marketing and socially responsible consumption have a weak correlation with corporate performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%