Corporate social responsibility in peer-to-peer accommodation: a focus on Airbnb

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide a critical synthesis of the interface of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation to offer insights that contribute to theory and practice of CSR in hospitality. Design/methodology/approach By using key CSR models, this paper reflects on the nexus between CSR and P2P accommodation (with a focus on Airbnb) to identify opportunities and challenges with regard to CSR implementation in P2P accommodation and, thereby, progress the research agenda on the topic. Findings This contribution will hopefully enable policymakers to improve the accountability of stakeholders related to P2P accommodation in terms of the sector’s impacts on local communities while contributing to the progression of the research agenda on CSR in hospitality. Research limitations/implications Because this contribution is meant to be a “critical reflection paper”, the main purpose is to flesh out a commentary offering recommendations on how to account for CSR in relation to P2P accommodation and primarily Airbnb. As such, this paper aims to prompt future empirical research on the topic. Naturally, the major downside of this type of paper is the lack of an empirical approach. Practical implications This paper advances theory on hospitality-related CSR, enabling policymakers to improve the stakeholders’ accountability related to P2P accommodation in terms of the sector’s impacts on local communities. Originality/value Despite the increasing importance of CSR in hospitality, minimal academic attention has been paid insofar to CSR in the P2P accommodation sector. This inattention is surprising given the rapid expansion of the sector which, in turn, has imposed significant pressures on local communities.

Uncovering the dark side of the sharing economy from a provider’s perspective: a bibliometric systematic review

“…Stakeholder theorists suggest that the very purpose of sharing platforms is to create value for the various stakeholder groups (Dreyer et al , 2017). However, recent research shows that conflicting requirements between stakeholders may result in value co-destruction and/or misalignment between sharing practices and sustainable development principles (Apostolidis and Brown, 2022; Buhalis et al , 2020; Farmaki et al , 2023). Especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the social and environmental responsibilities of sharing platforms have extended beyond traditional domains, putting additional pressure on conflict management.…”

“…Research in Cluster 3 primarily discussed issues related to gender-based discrimination and digital inequality. There is still room for further exploration of relevant social development issues caused by the rapid expansion of sharing economy providers (Chuah et al , 2022; Farmaki et al , 2023). It remains unclear what standards could be used to evaluate the corporate social responsibility (CSR) contribution by sharing economy platform providers and the potential impacts on small business longevity.…”

“…Different theoretical perspectives adopted among the collected studiesDreyer et al, 2017;Farmaki et al, 2023;Qi and Chen, 2023;Shin et al, 2023 Social exchange theoryAgyeiwaah, 2020;Anaya and De La Vega, 2022;Mody et al, 2021;Shin et al, 2023 …”