Corporate social responsibility, media attention and firm value: empirical research on Chinese manufacturing firms

Interactive effects of various institutional pressures on corporate environmental responsibility: Institutional theory and multilevel analysis

“…Corporate environmental responsibility (CER), which refers to the actions of corporations consistent with environmental ethics and legal requirements for sustainable environmental development (Lindgreen, Swaen, & Johnston, ), is eliciting great attention from academics, practitioners, and policy makers (Li, Xin, Chen, & Ren, ). The literature has attempted to explore whether and why firms take actions to protect the environment (Wu & Ma, ).…”

Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores

“…However, research is lacking on the validity of measuring CSR performance and disclosure quality, as well as the convergent validity between these scores. In this paper, a comparative and quantitative analysis was performed for the period 2010-2017, and the following results were obtained: (1) Based on a comparison of the rating methods, information sources, and other factors, RKS is more suitable for measuring the CSR disclosure quality, while Hexun is more suitable for measuring the CSR performance; (2) based on a Spearman correlation analysis, the convergent validity between these two scores is very low, particularly after 2013; and (3) the sub-indicator weights of the RKS system always maintain a high stability, whereas those of the Hexun system suffer from severe fluctuations starting in 2013.Sustainability 2019, 11, 3921 2 of 20 mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21][22][23], the drivers of CSR performance [24][25][26][27][28][29], and economic consequences [30][31][32][33][34][35]; and (2) the HX score is used only as a proxy for the CSR performance level, such as in research on the drivers of CSR performance [36][37][38][39][40] and the economic consequences of CSR performance [19,33,[41][42][43]. Some studies even use the level-1 sub-indicator of the HX score, the environmental dimension HXE, to score a firm's environmental performance level [44,45].Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 also for CSR performance levels, such as in research on the drivers of CSR disclosure quality [16][17][18][19], the mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21]…”

“…Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 also for CSR performance levels, such as in research on the drivers of CSR disclosure quality [16][17][18][19], the mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21][22][23], the drivers of CSR performance [24][25][26][27][28][29], and economic consequences [30][31][32][33][34][35]; and (2) the HX score is used only as a proxy for the CSR performance level, such as in research on the drivers of CSR performance [36][37][38][39][40] and the economic consequences of CSR performance [19,33,[41][42][43]. Some studies even use the level-1 sub-indicator of the HX score, the environmental dimension HXE, to score a firm's environmental performance level [44,45].…”

A Win-Win Outcome between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Value: From the Perspective of Stakeholders

“…These five dimensions include 13 second indexes and 37 third indexes [56], with a potential maximum score of 100 to aggregate the extent of each firm's overall CSP. Similar samples drawn from the Hexun CSP Database, such as Xiong et al [57], Li et al [58], Tang et al [6], etc., have also been published in prestigious academic journals.…”