Corporate social responsibility of Islamic and conventional banks

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to compare the sustainability practices of Islamic and conventional banks, with the aim of evaluating whether their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategies converge or diverge in response to formal and informal institutions in an emerging country. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional theory, this study contextualizes the competitive scenario through the National Business System (NBS) framework, and showcases the CSR strategies employed by large conventional and Islamic banks in Turkey. CSR patterns are examined from different angles such as motivations, strategy, actions and institutional results. Findings Within the same institutional environment, Islamic and non-Islamic banks combine convergent and divergent models to accommodate institutional realities in their CSR policies. Islamic banks exhibit an implicit commitment to CSR that is mostly based on informal institutions, whereas conventional banks use explicit CSR strategies as a means to fill the voids in formal institutions. In addition, philanthropy-oriented CSR prevails in Islamic banks, as opposed to the CSR actions associated with core business that are followed by conventional banks. Social implications An increased focus on formal institutions and explicit CSR actions by Islamic banks may further contribute to social well-being in emerging countries. Originality/value This study contributes to the paucity of research, from an institutional perspective, related to CSR practices amongst Islamic and conventional banks in emerging countries.

African Immigrant Entrepreneurship in the UK

“…Extending further the findings from this study in line with broad performance literature, this study offers insight that lends support to Islamic context literature which suggests that some organisations may prioritise non-financial performance (welfare of customers) (e.g. Aracil, 2019) over financial performance. Indeed, as noted by these scholars prioritising customers welfare ultimately boosts financial performance.…”

Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art

“…Third, Institutional Theory predicts the impact on social and economic actors of factors located at the institutional level such as systemic norms and beliefs, economic development, and other factors at the regional or national level (Maas and Liket 2011). Institutions are the set of societal norms that limit human interaction and are necessary to protect the rights of these economic agents (North 1990), so that their absence or malfunctioning prevents or creates barriers to economic activity (Aracil 2019). Thus, according to institutional theory, companies with their behavior do not seek efficiency, but rather, survive and operate in the market (Zerbini 2017).…”

Advancing transcendent development: An in‐depth review of developmental corporate social responsibility’s value proposition, inhibitions, and inclusive sustainable development prospects

“…Some scholars replaced “DO” terminology with concepts such as The South or Global South with some publications even going as far as classifying international trade relations between developing countries as South–South Trade or South–South Cooperation (Arevalo, 2014; Barkemeyer & Miklian, 2019; Hayk, 2019; Lund‐Thomsen et al., 2014; de Melo et al., 2019; Mihić et al., 2019). Another conceptual synonym used for “DO” is the commonly known development finance and investment term Emerging compounded with other descriptors resulting in conceptual alternatives like Emerging Country , Emerging Economy , Emerging Market, and even Emerging Nation (Aracil, 2019; Mukhopadhyay & Paul, 2019; Tong et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2015). Figure 4 illustrates the various conceptual and geographical synonyms comprising the “DO” synonymic lexical superfluity that has also contributed to DCSR’s plateau more lucidly.…”