2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*

Abstract:  We describe a variety of perspectives on corporate social responsibility (CSR), which we use to develop a framework for consideration of the strategic implications of CSR. Based on this framework, we propose an agenda for additional theoretical and empirical research on CSR. We then review the papers in this special issue and relate them to the proposed agenda.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,683
3
97

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,420 publications
(1,810 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
27
1,683
3
97
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding supports the argument put forth by McWilliams, Siegel, and Wright (2006) that established organizations invest more in CSR. The underlying motive behind emphasizing CSR is the goal of being perceived as a good corporate citizen by all stakeholders (Maignan & Ferrell, 2001) and building a strong reputation (Brammer, Millington, & Rayton, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding supports the argument put forth by McWilliams, Siegel, and Wright (2006) that established organizations invest more in CSR. The underlying motive behind emphasizing CSR is the goal of being perceived as a good corporate citizen by all stakeholders (Maignan & Ferrell, 2001) and building a strong reputation (Brammer, Millington, & Rayton, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although some internal CSR investments may reflect a concern with legal aspects and aim at reducing labor-related costs (Barnett, 2007), several I-CSR initiatives can promote positive employee attitudes and their improved performance, and therefore affect organizational effectiveness, particularly those that directly affect individual employees (Cohen, 2010;Mcwilliams, Siegel, & Wright, 2006). Researchers have suggested that companies with a socially responsible culture have an intangible asset to attract, retain, and engage the workforce (Bhattacharya, Korschun, & Sen, 2009).…”
Section: Internal Corporate Social Responsibility (I-csr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, top-tier suppliers need to avoid purposefully overstating their own CSR capabilities, a practice often referred to as "greenwashing," which might harm the supplier's trustworthiness. A positive reputation towards CSR in this context can equip top-tier suppliers with a competitive advantage in their respective customer markets (McWilliams, Siegel, and Wright 2006). First, it enhances the probability of winning additional business in the case that potential buyers, who are not yet customers of the supplier, are looking for alternatives with a CSR-ensuring capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research increasingly focuses on the link between CSR-related business practices and corporate reputation (e.g., Husted and De Jesus Salazar 2006;Janney and Gove 2011;McWilliams, Siegel, and Wright 2006). In this context, scholars argued that social or environmental misconduct is not necessarily detrimental to an organization, as long as the firm does not purposely cause misconduct and promptly rectifies the wrongdoing (Campbell 2007 and Hoyt 2008;Tang 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%