2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijchm-01-2017-0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility: the effect of need-for-status and fluency on consumers’ attitudes

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand the joint effects of individuals’ need for status and processing fluency on customer attitudes toward hotels’ participation in corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a 2 (Need for status: high vs low) × 2 (Processing fluency: high vs low) experimental design with processing fluency being manipulated and individuals’ need for status being measured. Findings The results indicate that although high-need for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of how CSR has been manipulated include the following: low and high CSR standards/performance (León & Araña, 2014); positive, negative, and no CSR (Albus & Ro, 2017); altruistic, strategic, and no CSR (E. E. K. Kim et al, 2012); credible versus noncredible sources (S. B. Marchoo et al, 2014); and low and high processing fluency (Line et al, 2016;Zhang, 2014;Zhang & Hanks, 2017;Zhang, Yang et al, 2018). Analysis of the scales used to measure CSR in this theme did not result in significant patterns.…”
Section: Csr and Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of how CSR has been manipulated include the following: low and high CSR standards/performance (León & Araña, 2014); positive, negative, and no CSR (Albus & Ro, 2017); altruistic, strategic, and no CSR (E. E. K. Kim et al, 2012); credible versus noncredible sources (S. B. Marchoo et al, 2014); and low and high processing fluency (Line et al, 2016;Zhang, 2014;Zhang & Hanks, 2017;Zhang, Yang et al, 2018). Analysis of the scales used to measure CSR in this theme did not result in significant patterns.…”
Section: Csr and Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Lin & Chung, 2019;Liu et al, 2014;Martínez & Rodríguez del Bosque, 2013;Su et al, 2017;Swimberghe & Wooldridge, 2014). Other studies used theories such as information processing and cognitive-affective theory (Boronat-Navarro & Pérez-Aranda, 2019; Line et al, 2016;Rahman et al, 2015;Siu et al, 2014;Zhang & Hanks, 2017;Zhang, Yang, et al, 2018). SIT theory relates to "[.…”
Section: Csr and Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researches indicate that high-need for status customers exhibit a more positive attitude than low-need for status customers when the CSR message is easy to process. (Zhang, 2018) The activities related to environmental protection, joint campaigns with partners and suppliers, activities organised in the micro-environment of the company or in smaller settlements, etc. can be listed here.…”
Section: Csr or Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, status-seeking consumers tend to prefer green products to their better performing nongreen counterparts (Griskevicius, Tybur, & Van den Bergh, 2010). Similarly, corporate social responsibility information elicits more favorable attitudes toward a hotel brand among consumers high (vs. low) in need for status as long as the information can be easily processed (Zhang, Yang, & Zheng, 2018). Another example is busyness or lack of leisure time, which may communicate valued human capital characteristics such as competence and, thus, high status (Bellezza, Paharia, & Keinan, 2016).…”
Section: Status Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research adds to the emerging inquiry on nontraditional status markers. Although well-established status literature primarily focuses on luxury goods, growing stream of literature shows that proenvironmental manufactured goods (Griskevicius et al, 2010), organic foods (Puska et al, 2018), and socially responsible initiatives (Zhang et al, 2018) also attract status seekers. Our findings provide insight into another overlooked status symbol-healthiness of food.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%